Compositions and methods for controlling insect pests

ABSTRACT

Disclosed herein are methods of controlling insect pests which infest crop plants, in particular Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm), Lygus hesperus (western tarnished plant bug), Euschistus heros (neotropical brown stink bug), and Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth), and methods of providing plants resistant to such pests. Also disclosed are polynucleotides and recombinant DNA molecules and constructs useful in such methods, insecticidal compositions such as topical sprays containing insecticidal double-stranded RNAs, and plants with improved resistance to infestation by these insects. Further disclosed are methods of selecting target genes for RNAi-mediated silencing and control of these insect pests.

CROSS-REFERENCE TO RELATED APPLICATIONS AND INCORPORATION OF SEQUENCELISTINGS

This application claims priority to U. S. Provisional Patent ApplicationNo. 61/973,484 filed 1 Apr. 2014, which is incorporated by reference inits entirety herein. The sequence listing contained in the file“40-21_70001_0000_US_ST25.txt” (49 kilobytes, created on 1 Apr. 2014,filed with U.S. Provisional Patent Application No. 61/973,484 on 1 Apr.2014), and the replacement sequence listing contained in the file“40-21_70001_0000_US_ST25.txt” (49 kilobytes, created on 4 Apr. 2014,filed as a replacement sequence listing on 4 Apr. 2014 solely to correctthe listing of inventors), are incorporated by in their entirety herein.The sequence listing contained in the file“40-21_70001_0000_WO_ST25.txt” (70 kilobytes, created on 13 Mar. 2015)is filed herewith and is incorporated by reference in its entiretyherein.

FIELD OF THE INVENTION

Disclosed herein are methods for controlling invertebrate pestinfestations, particularly in plants, and compositions andpolynucleotides useful in such methods. More specifically, thisinvention is related to polynucleotides and methods of use thereof formodifying the expression of genes in an invertebrate pest, particularlythrough RNA interference. Pest species of interest include insects thatinfest crop plants, e. g., Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth),Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm), Lygus hesperus (western tarnishedplant bug), and Euschistus heros (neotropical brown stink bug).

BACKGROUND OF THE INVENTION

Commercial crops are often the targets of attack by invertebrate pestssuch as insects. Compositions for controlling insect infestations inplants have typically been in the form of chemical insecticides.However, there are several disadvantages to using chemical insecticides.For example, chemical insecticides are generally not selective, andapplications of chemical insecticides intended to control insect pestsin crop plants can exert their effects on non-target insects and otherinvertebrates as well. Chemical insecticides often persist in theenvironment and can be slow to degrade, thus potentially accumulating inthe food chain. Furthermore the use of persistent chemical insecticidescan result in the development of resistance in the target insectspecies. Thus there has been a long felt need for more environmentallyfriendly methods for controlling or eradicating insect infestation on orin plants, i. e., methods which are species-selective, environmentallyinert, non-persistent, and biodegradable, and that fit well into pestresistance management schemes.

Insecticidal compositions that include Bacillus thuringiensis (“Bt”)bacteria have been commercially available and used as environmentallysafe and acceptable insecticides for more than thirty years. Theeffectiveness of these compositions is due to insecticidal proteins thatare produced exclusively by Bt bacteria. The insecticidal Bt proteins donot persist in the environment, are highly selective as to the targetspecies affected, exert their effects only upon ingestion by a targetinsect, and have been shown to be harmless to plants and othernon-targeted organisms, including humans and other vertebrates.Transgenic plants containing one or more recombinant genes encodinginsecticidal Bt proteins are also available in the art and are resistantto insect pest infestation. One positive environmental result of the useof transgenic plants expressing Bt proteins is a decrease in the amountof chemical insecticides that are applied to control pest infestation insuch transgenic crop fields, resulting in decreased contamination ofsoil and waters by non-degraded or excess chemical insecticides. Inaddition, there has been a noticeable increase in the numbers ofbeneficial insects in fields in which Bt protein-expressing transgeniccrop plants are grown because of the decrease in the use ofnon-selective chemical insecticides.

RNA interference (RNAi, RNA-mediated gene suppression) is anotherapproach used for pest control. In invertebrates RNAi-based genesuppression was first demonstrated in nematodes (Fire et al., (1998)Nature, 391:806-811; Timmons & Fire (1998) Nature, 395:854).Subsequently, RNAi-based suppression of invertebrate genes usingrecombinant nucleic acid techniques has been reported in a number ofspecies, including agriculturally or economically important pests fromvarious insect and nematode taxa. such as: root-knot nematodes(Meloidogyne spp.), see Huang et al. (2006) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA,103:14302-14306, doi:10.1073/pnas.0604698103); cotton bollworm(Helicoverpa armigera), see Mao et al. (2007) Nature Biotechnol.,25:1307-1313, doi:10.1038/nbt1352; Western corn rootworm (Diabroticavirgifera LeConte), see Baum et al. (2007) Nature Biotechnol.,25:1322-1326, doi:10.1038/nbt1359; sugar beet cyst nematode (Heteroderaschachtii), see Sindhu et al. (2008) J. Exp. Botany, 60:315-324,doi:10.1093/jxb/ern289; mosquito (Aedes aegypti), see Pridgeon et al.(2008) J. Med. Entomol., 45:414-420, doi:full/10.1603/0022-2585%282008%2945%5B414%3ATAADRK%5D2.0.00%3B2 fruitflies (Drosophila melanogaster), flour beetles (Triboliutn castaneum),pea aphids (Acyrthosiphon pisum), and tobacco hornworms (Manduca sexta),see Whyard et al. (2009) Insect Biochem. Mol. Biol., 39:824-832,doi:10.1016/j.ibmb.2009.09.00; diamondback moth (Plutella xylostella),see Gong et al. (2011) Pest Manag. Sci., 67: 514-520,doi:10.1002/ps.2086; green peach aphid (Myzus persicae), see Pilino etal. (2011) PLoS ONE, 6:e25709, doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0025709; brownplanthopper (Nilaparvata lugens), see Li et al. (2011) Pest Manag. Sci.,67:852-859, doi:10.1002/ps.2124; and whitefly (Bemisia tabaci), seeUpadhyay et al. (2011) J. Biosci., 36:153-161,doi:10.1007/s12038-011-9009-1.

This invention is related to methods of controlling insect pests, inparticular insects which infest crop plants and have previously beenfound to be recalcitrant to RNA-mediated gene suppression methods, e.g., Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth), Spodoptera frugiperda (fallarmyworm), Lygus hesperus (western tarnished plant bug), and Euschistusheros (neotropical brown stink bug). Double-stranded RNA (dsRNA) triggersequences have been identified for testing on the recalcitrant insectspecies Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth, DBM), Spodopterafrugiperda (fall armyworm, FAW), Lygus hesperus (western tarnished plantbug, WTPB), and Euschistus heros (neotropical brown stink bug, NBSB).These triggers are designed to suppress novel target genes that areputative orthologues of genes previously demonstrated to be efficacioustargets for RNAi-mediated mortality in Western corn rootworm (Diabroticavirgifera).

This invention is further related to polynucleotides and recombinant DNAmolecules and constructs useful in methods of controlling insect pests.This invention is further related to insecticidal compositions, as wellas to transgenic plants resistant to infestation by insect pests. Thisinvention is also related to methods of identifying efficaciousdouble-stranded RNA triggers for controlling insect pests, and methodsfor identifying target genes that are likely to represent essentialfunctions, making these genes preferred targets for RNAi-mediatedsilencing and control of insect pests.

SUMMARY OF THE INVENTION

This invention is related to control of insect species, especially thosethat are economically or agriculturally important pests. Thecompositions and methods of this invention include recombinantpolynucleotide molecules, such as recombinant DNA constructs for makingtransgenic plants resistant to infestation by insect species and RNA“triggers” that are useful, e. g., as topically applied agents forcausing RNAi-mediated suppression of a target gene in a insect speciesand thus controlling or preventing infestation by that insect species.Another utility of this invention is a polynucleotide-containingcomposition (e. g., a composition containing a dsRNA trigger forsuppressing a target gene) that is topically applied to an insectspecies or to a plant, plant part, or seed to be protected frominfestation by an insect species. This invention is further related tomethods for selecting preferred insect target genes that arc more likelyto be effective targets for RNAi-mediated control of an insect species.

In one aspect, this invention provides a method for controlling aninsect infestation of a plant including contacting with a dsRNA aninsect that infests a plant, wherein the dsRNA includes at least onesegment of 18 or more contiguous nucleotides with a sequence of about95% to about 100% complementarity with a fragment of a target gene ofthe insect, and wherein the target gene has a DNA sequence selected fromthe group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-12 and 43-44. In embodiments, thedsRNA includes an RNA strand with a sequence of about 95% to about 100%identity or complementarity with a sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46. Inembodiments, the dsRNA includes an RNA strand with a sequence selectedfrom the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46.In embodiments, the dsRNA trigger suppresses a gene in the insect andstunts or kills the insect.

In another aspect, this invention provides a method of causing mortalityor stunting in an insect, including providing in the diet of an insectat least one recombinant RNA including at least one silencing elementessentially identical or essentially complementary to a fragment of atarget gene sequence of the insect, wherein the target gene sequence isselected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-12 and 43-44, andwherein ingestion of the recombinant RNA by the insect results inmortality or stunting in the insect. In embodiments, the silencingelement includes an RNA strand with a sequence of about 95% to about100% identity or complementarity with a sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46. Inembodiments, the silencing clement includes an RNA strand with asequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29,30-42, 45, and 46.

In another aspect, this invention provides an insecticidal compositionincluding an insecticidally effective amount of a recombinant RNAmolecule, wherein the recombinant RNA molecule includes at least onesegment of 18 or more contiguous nucleotides with a sequence of about95% to about 100% complementarily with a fragment of a target gene of aninsect that infests a plant, and wherein the target gene has a DNAsequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-12 and43-44. In embodiments, the recombinant RNA molecule is dsRNA. Inembodiments, the recombinant RNA molecule includes at least one segment(e. g., an RNA strand or segment of an RNA strand) with a sequence ofabout 95% to about 100% identity or complementarity with a sequenceselected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42,45, and 46. In embodiments, the recombinant RNA molecule includes atleast one segment (e. g., an RNA strand or segment of an RNA strand)with a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26,28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46.

In another aspect, this invention provides a method of providing a planthaving improved resistance to an insect, including expressing in theplant a recombinant DNA construct including DNA encoding at least onesilencing element essentially identical or essentially complementary toa fragment of a target gene sequence of the insect, wherein the targetgene sequence is selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-12and 43-44, and wherein ingestion of the recombinant RNA by the insectresults in mortality or stunting in the insect. In embodiments, thesilencing element is ssRNA. In other embodiments, the silencing elementis dsRNA. In embodiments, the silencing element includes RNA (e. g., anRNA strand or segment of an RNA strand) with a sequence of about 95% toabout 100% identity or complementarity with a sequence selected from thegroup consisting of SEQ Ill NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46. Inembodiments, the silencing element includes RNA (e. g., an RNA strand orsegment of an RNA strand) with a sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46.

In another aspect, this invention provides a recombinant DNA constructincluding a heterologous promoter, such as a heterologous promoterfunctional in a bacterial cell or in a eukaryotic cell (e. g., a plantcell or an insect cell), operably linked to DNA encoding an RNAtranscript including a sequence of about 95% to about 100% identity orcomplementarity with a sequence selected from the group consisting ofSEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46. In embodiments, the RNAtranscript is ssRNA. In other embodiments, the RNA transcript is dsRNA.In embodiments, the silencing element includes RNA (e. g., an RNA strandor segment of an RNA strand) with a sequence of about 95% to about 100%identity or complementarity with a sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46. Inembodiments, the silencing element includes RNA (e. g., an RNA strand orsegment of an RNA strand) with a sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46.

In related aspects, this invention provides man-made compositionsincluding the polynucleotide or trigger of this invention, such as dsRNAformulations useful for topical application to a plant or substance inneed of protection from an insect infestation, recombinant constructsand vectors useful for making transgenic plant cells and transgenicplants, formulations and coatings useful for treating plants (includingplant seeds or propagatable parts such as tubers), plant seeds orpropagatable parts such as tubers treated with or containing apolynucleotide of this invention as well as commodity products andfoodstuffs produced from such plants, seeds, or propagatable parts(especially commodity products and foodstuffs having a detectable amountof a polynucleotide of this invention). A further aspect of thisinvention are polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies that bind a peptide orprotein encoded by a sequence or a fragment of a sequence selected fromthe group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-12 and 43-44; another aspect ofthis invention are polyclonal or monoclonal antibodies that hind apeptide or protein encoded by a sequence or a fragment of a sequenceselected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42,45, and 46 or the complement thereof. Such antibodies are made byroutine methods as known to one of ordinary skill in the art.

Other aspects and specific embodiments of this invention are disclosedin the following detailed description and working Examples.

BRIEF DESCRIPTION OF THE DRAWINGS

FIG. 1 depicts the results of the transfection experiments described inExample 2 for the dsRNA triggers (TOP PANEL) T34640 (SEQ ID NO:17,targetting V-ATPase A subunit), (MIDDLE PANEL) T34642 (SEQ ID NO:18,targetting COPI coatomer beta subunit), or (BOTTOM PANEL) T34644 (SEQ IDNO:19, targetting COPI coatomer beta prime subunit) in Spodopterafrugipertla (fall armyworm, FAW) SF9 cells.

FIG. 2 depicts the results of the transfection experiments described inExample 2 for the dsRNA triggers (TOP PANEL) T42017 (SEQ ID NO:21,targetting V-ATPase subunit A), (TOP PANEL) T33310 (SEQ ID NO:29,targetting V-ATPase subunit A), (MIDDLE PANEL) T32938 (SEQ ID NO:28,targetting COPI coatomer beta subunit), and (BOTTOM PANEL) T32937 (SEQID NO:13, targetting COPI coatomer beta prime subunit) in Plutellaxylostella (diamondback moth, DBM) cells.

DETAILED DESCRIPTION OF THE INVENTION

Unless defined otherwise, all technical and scientific terms used havethe same meaning as commonly understood by one of ordinary skill in theart to which this invention belongs. Generally, the nomenclature usedand the manufacturing or laboratory procedures described below are wellknown and commonly employed in the art. Conventional methods are usedfor these procedures, such as those provided in the art and variousgeneral references. Where a term is provided in the singular, theinventors also contemplate aspects of the invention described by theplural of that term. Where there are discrepancies in terms anddefinitions used in references that are incorporated by reference, theterms used in this application shall have the definitions given. Othertechnical terms used have their ordinary meaning in the art in whichthey are used, as exemplified by various art-specific dictionaries, forexample, “The American Heritage® Science Dictionary” (Editors of theAmerican Heritage Dictionaries, 2011, Houghton Mifflin Harcourt, Bostonand New York), the “McGraw-Hill Dictionary of Scientific and TechnicalTerms” (6^(th) edition, 2002, McGraw-Hill, New York), or the “OxfordDictionary of Biology” (6^(th) edition, 2008, Oxford University Press,Oxford and New York). The inventors do not intend to be limited to amechanism or mode of action. Reference thereto is provided forillustrative purposes only.

Unless otherwise stated, nucleic acid sequences in the text of thisspecification are given, when read from left to right, in the 5′ to 3′direction. One of skill in the art would be aware that a given DNAsequence is understood to define a corresponding RNA sequence which isidentical to the DNA sequence except for replacement of the thymine (T)nucleotides of the DNA with uracil (U) nucleotides. Thus, providing aspecific DNA sequence is understood to define the exact RNA equivalent.A given first polynucleotide sequence, whether DNA or RNA, furtherdefines the sequence of its exact complement (which can be DNA or RNA),i. e., a second polynucleotide that hybridizes perfectly to the firstpolynucleotide by forming Watson-Crick base-pairs. By “essentiallyidentical” or “essentially complementary” to a target gene or a fragmentof a target gene is meant that a polynucleotide strand (or at least onestrand of a double-stranded polynucleotide) is designed to hybridize(generally under physiological conditions such as those found in aliving plant or animal cell) to a target gene or to a fragment of atarget gene or to the transcript of the target gene or the fragment of atarget gene; one of skill in the art would understand that suchhybridization does not necessarily require 100% sequence identity orcomplementarity. A first nucleic acid sequence is “operably” connectedor “linked” with a second nucleic acid sequence when the first nucleicacid sequence is placed in a functional relationship with the secondnucleic acid sequence. For example, a promoter sequence is “operablylinked” to DNA if the promoter provides for transcription or expressionof the DNA. Generally, operably linked DNA sequences are contiguous.

The term “polynucleotide” commonly refers to a DNA or RNA moleculecontaining multiple nucleotides and generally refers both to“oligonucleotides” (a polynucleotide molecule of 18-25 nucleotides inlength) and longer polynucleotides of 26 or more nucleotides.Polynucleotides also include molecules containing multiple nucleotidesincluding non-canonical nucleotides or chemically modified nucleotidesas commonly practiced in the art; see, e. g., chemical modificationsdisclosed in the technical manual “RNA Interference (RNAi) and DsiRNAs”,2011 (Integrated DNA Technologies Coralville, Iowa). Generally,polynucleotides or triggers of this invention, whether DNA or RNA orboth, and whether single- or double-stranded, include at least onesegment of 18 or more contiguous nucleotides (or, in the case ofdouble-stranded polynucleotides, at least 18 contiguous base-pairs) thatare essentially identical or complementary to a fragment of equivalentsize of the DNA of a target gene or the target gene's RNA transcript.Throughout this disclosure, “at least 18 contiguous” means “from about18 to about 10,000, including every whole number point in between”.Thus, embodiments of this invention include compositions includingoligonucleotides having a length of 18-25 nucleotides (18-mers, 19-mers,20-mers, 21-mers, 22-mers, 23-mers, 24-mers, or 25-mers), ormedium-length polynucleotides having a length of 26 or more nucleotides(polynucleotides of 26, 27, 28, 29, 30, 31, 32, 33, 34, 35, 36, 37, 38,39, 40, 41, 42, 43, 44, 45, 46, 47, 48, 49, 50, 51, 52, 53, 54, 55, 56,57, 58, 59, 60, about 65, about 70, about 75, about 80, about 85, about90, about 95, about 100, about 110, about 120, about 130, about 140,about 150, about 160, about 170, about 180, about 190, about 200, about210, about 220, about 230, about 240, about 250, about 260, about 270,about 280, about 290, or about 300 nucleotides), or long polynucleotideshaving a length greater than about 300 nucleotides (e. g.,polynucleotides of between about 300 to about 400 nucleotides, betweenabout 400 to about 500 nucleotides, between about 500 to about 600nucleotides, between about 600 to about 700 nucleotides, between about700 to about 800 nucleotides, between about 800 to about 900nucleotides, between about 900 to about 1000 nucleotides, between about300 to about 500 nucleotides, between about 300 to about 600nucleotides, between about 300 to about 700 nucleotides, between about300 to about 800 nucleotides, between about 300 to about 900nucleotides, or about 1000 nucleotides in length, or even greater thanabout 1000 nucleotides in length, for example up to the entire length ofa target gene including coding or non-coding or both coding andnon-coding portions of the target gene). Where a polynucleotide isdouble-stranded, such as the dsRNA triggers described in the workingExamples, its length can be similarly described in terms of base pairs.Double-stranded polynucleotides, such as the dsRNA triggers described inthe working examples, can further be described in terms of one or moreof the single-stranded components.

The polynucleotides or triggers of this invention are generally designedto suppress or silence one or more genes (“target genes”). The term“gene” refers to any portion of a nucleic acid that provides forexpression of a transcript or encodes a transcript. A “gene” caninclude, but is not limited to, a promoter region, 5′ untranslatedregions, transcript encoding regions that can include intronic regions,3′ untranslated regions, or combinations of these regions. Inembodiments, the target genes can include coding or non-coding sequenceor both. In other embodiments, the target gene has a sequence identicalto or complementary to a messenger RNA, e. g., in embodiments the targetgene is a cDNA.

Controlling Insect Infestations of a Plant by Contacting with a dsRNA

A first aspect of this invention provides a method for controlling aninsect infestation of a plant including contacting with adouble-stranded RNA (dsRNA) an insect that infests a plant, wherein thedsRNA includes at least one segment of 18 or more contiguous nucleotideswith a sequence of about 95% to about 100% (e. g., about 95%, about 96%,about 97%, about 98%, about 99%, or about 100%) complementarity with afragment of a target gene of the insect, and wherein the target gene hasa DNA sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-12 and43-44. In this context “controlling” includes inducement of aphysiological or behavioural change in an insect (adult or larvae ornymphs) such as, but not limited to, growth stunting, increasedmortality, decrease in reproductive capacity, decrease in or cessationof feeding behavior or movement, or decrease in or cessation ofmetamorphosis stage development. “Double-stranded” refers to thebase-pairing that occurs between sufficiently complementary,anti-parallel nucleic acid strands to form a double-stranded nucleicacid structure, generally under physiologically relevant conditions.

In various embodiments, the insect is selected from the group consistingof Spodoptera spp., Lygus spp., Euschistus spp., and Plutella spp.Insects of particular interest include Spodoptera frugiperda (fallarmyworm), Lygus hesperus (western tarnished plant bug), Euschistus hews(neotropical brown stink bug), and Plutella xylostella (diamondbackmoth).

Various embodiments of the method include those wherein the insect isSpodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) and the target gene includes a DNAsequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-3; whereinthe insect is Lygus hesperus (western tarnished plant bug) and thetarget gene includes a DNA sequence selected from the group consistingof SEQ ID NOs:4-7, 43, and 44; wherein the insect is Euschistus heros(neotropical brown stink bug) and the target gene includes a DNAsequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:8-9; andwherein the insect is Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth) and thetarget gene includes a DNA sequence selected from the group consistingof SEQ ID NOs:10-12. Other embodiments of the method include thosewherein the insect is Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) and thedsRNA includes a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ IDNOs:17-19; wherein the insect is Lygus hesperus (western tarnished plantbug) and the dsRNA includes a sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:14-16, 22, 26, 45, and 46; wherein the insectis Euschistus heros (neotropical brown stink bug) and the dsRNA includesa sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:23-25; andwherein the insect is Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth) and thedsRNA includes a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ IDNOs:13, 20-21, and 28-29. Other embodiments include those where thedsRNA has a sequence modified as described in Example 5 to eliminatematches to non-target organisms, such as the modified sequences (SEQ IDNOs:30-42) disclosed in Table 6.

The plant can be any plant that is subject to infestation by an insectthat can be controlled by the polynucleotides disclosed herein. Plantsof particular interest include commercially important plants, includingrow crop plants, vegetables, and fruits, and other plants ofagricultural or decorative use. Examples of suitable plants are providedunder the heading “Plants”.

In embodiments of the method, the dsRNA includes multiple segments eachof 18 or more contiguous nucleotides with a sequence of about 95% toabout 100% (e. g., about 95%, about 96%, about 97%, about 98%, about99%, or about 100%) complementarity with a fragment of a target gene ofthe insect. For example, the dsRNA can include segments corresponding todifferent regions of the target gene, or can include multiple copies ofa segment. In other embodiments of the method, the dsRNA includesmultiple segments, each of 18 or more contiguous nucleotides with asequence of about 95% to about 100% (e. g., about 95%, about 96%, about97%, about 98%, about 99%, or about 100%) complementarity with afragment of a different target gene; in this way multiple target genes,or multiple insect species, can be suppressed.

In embodiments of the method, the dsRNA is blunt-ended. In otherembodiments, the dsRNA has an overhang at one or both ends (termini);the overhang can be a single nucleotide or 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or morenucleotides, and can be located on the 5′ end or on the 3′ end of astrand. The dsRNA can be chemically synthesized, or can be produced byexpression in a microorganism, by expression in a plant cell, or bymicrobial fermentation. The dsRNA can be chemically modified, e. g., toimprove stability or efficacy.

In some embodiments of the method, the contacting includes applicationof a composition including the dsRNA to a surface of the insect or to asurface of the plant infested by the insect. The composition can includeor be in the form of a solid, liquid, powder, suspension, emulsion,spray, encapsulation, microbeads, carrier particulates, film, matrix, orseed treatment. In embodiments, the composition can be applied to aseed, e. g., by soaking the seed in a liquid composition including thedsRNA, wherein the seed imbibes or takes up the dsRNA into the seedinterior or seed endosperm in an effective amount to provide improvedresistance to the insect pest by the seed or a plant or seedling grownfrom the seed. In embodiments, the contacting includes providing thedsRNA in a composition that further includes one or more componentsselected from the group consisting of a carrier agent, a surfactant, anorganosilicone, a polynucleotide herbicidal molecule, anon-polynucleotide herbicidal molecule, a non-polynucleotide pesticide,a safener, an insect attractant, and an insect growth regulator. Inembodiments, the contacting includes providing the dsRNA in acomposition that further includes at least one pesticidal agent selectedfrom the group consisting of a patatin, a plant lectin, aphytoecdysteroid, a Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal protein, aXenorhabdus insecticidal protein, a Photorhabdus insecticidal protein, aBacillus laterosporous insecticidal protein, and a Bacillus sphaericusinsecticidal protein.

In some embodiments of the method, the contacting includes providing thedsRNA in a composition that is ingested by the insect, such as in aliquid, emulsion, or powder applied to a plant on which the insectfeeds, or in the form of bait. Such compositions can further includesone or more components selected from the group consisting of a carrieragent, a surfactant, an organosilicone, a polynucleotide herbicidalmolecule, a non-polynucleotide herbicidal molecule, a non-polynucleotidepesticide, a safener, an insect attractant, and an insect growthregulator. Such compositions can further include at least one pesticidalagent selected from the group consisting of a patatin, a plant lectin, aphytoecdysteroid, a Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal protein, aXenorhabdus insecticidal protein, a Photorhabdus insecticidal protein, aBacillus laterosporous insecticidal protein, and a Bacillus sphaericusinsecticidal protein. In embodiments, the combination of the dsRNA andthe pesticidal agent provides a level of insect control that issynergistic, i. e., greater than the sum of the effects of the dsRNA andthe pesticidal agent components if tested separately.

Methods of Causing Mortality or Stunting in an Insect

Another aspect of this invention provides a method of causing mortalityor stunting in an insect, including providing in the diet of an insectat least one recombinant RNA including at least one silencing elementessentially identical or essentially complementary to a fragment of atarget gene sequence of the insect, wherein the target gene sequence isselected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-12 and 43-44, andwherein ingestion of the recombinant RNA by the insect results inmortality or stunting in the insect. The method is applicable to insectsat various life stages. In embodiments, the method causes mortality orstunting in an insect larva or nymph. In other embodiments, the methodcauses mortality in adult insects.

In embodiments of the method the recombinant RNA includes at least oneRNA strand having a sequence of about 95% to about 100% (e. g., about95%, about 96%, about 97%, about 98%, about 99%, or about 100%) identityor complementarity with a sequence selected from the group consisting ofSEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46. Embodiments of the methodinclude those wherein the insect is Spodoptera frugiperda (fallarmyworm) and the target gene includes a DNA sequence selected from thegroup consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-3; wherein the insect is Lygus hesperus(western tarnished plant bug) and the target gene includes a DNAsequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:4-7, 43, and44; wherein the insect is Euschistus heros (neotropical brown stink bug)and the target gene includes a DNA sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:8-9; and wherein the insect is Plutellaxylostella (diamondback moth) and the target gene includes a DNAsequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:10-12. Otherembodiments of the method include those wherein the insect is Spodopterafrugiperda (fall armyworm) and the silencing element includes a sequenceselected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:17-19; wherein theinsect is Lygus hesperus (western tarnished plant bug) and the silencingelement includes a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ IDNOs:14-16, 22, 26, 45, and 46; wherein the insect is Euschistus heros(neotropical brown stink bug) and the silencing element includes asequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:23-25; andwherein the insect is Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth) and thesilencing element includes a sequence selected from the group consistingof SEQ ID NOs:13, 20-21, and 28-29. Other embodiments include thosewhere the recombinant RNA has a sequence modified as described inExample 5 to eliminate matches to non-target organisms, such as themodified sequences (SEQ ID NOs:30-42) disclosed in Table 6.

In embodiments of the method, the recombinant RNA is dsRNA. In theseembodiments, the dsRNA can be blunt-ended dsRNA, or can be dsRNA with anoverhang at one or both ends (termini); the overhang can be a singlenucleotide or 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or more nucleotides, and can be located onthe 5′ end or on the 3′ end of a strand. The dsRNA can be chemicallysynthesized, or can be produced by expression in a microorganism, byexpression in a plant cell, or by microbial fermentation. The dsRNA canbe chemically modified, e. g., to improve stability or efficacy. Inembodiments of the method where the recombinant RNA is dsRNA, the dsRNAincludes at least one RNA strand having a sequence of about 95% to about100% identity or complementarity with a sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46.

In some embodiments of the method, the recombinant RNA is provided inthe insect's diet in the form of an ingestible composition, such as in aliquid, emulsion, or powder applied to a plant on which the insectfeeds, or in the form of bait. Such ingestible compositions can furtherincludes one or more components selected from the group consisting of acarrier agent, a surfactant, an organosilicone, a polynucleotideherbicidal molecule, a non-polynucleotide herbicidal molecule, anon-polynucleotide pesticide, a safener, an insect attractant, and aninsect growth regulator. Such ingestible compositions can furtherinclude at least one pesticidal agent selected from the group consistingof a patatin, a plant lectin, a phytoecdysteroid, a Bacillusthuringiensis insecticidal protein, a Xenorhabdus insecticidal protein,a Photothabdus insecticidal protein, a Bacillus laterosporousinsecticidal protein, and a Bacillus sphaericus insecticidal protein. Inembodiments, the combination of the recombinant RNA and the pesticidalagent provides a level of insect stunting or mortality that issynergistic, i. e., greater than the sum of the effects of therecombinant RNA and the pesticidal agent components if testedseparately.

Insecticidal Compositions

Another aspect of the invention provides an insecticidal compositionincluding an insecticidally effective amount of a recombinant RNAmolecule, wherein the recombinant RNA molecule includes at least onesegment of 18 or more contiguous nucleotides with a sequence of about95% to about 100% (e. g., about 95%, about 96%, about 97%, about 98%,about 99%, or about 100%) complementarity with a fragment of a targetgene of an insect that infests a plant, and wherein the target gene hasa DNA sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-12 and43-44. By “insecticidally effective” is meant effective in inducing aphysiological or behavioural change in an insect (adult or larvae ornymphs) that infests a plant such as, but not limited to, growthstunting, increased mortality, decrease in reproductive capacity ordecreased fecundity, decrease in or cessation of feeding behavior ormovement, or decrease in or cessation of metamorphosis stagedevelopment; in embodiments, application of an insecticidally effectiveamount of the recombinant RNA molecule to a plant improves the plant'sresistance to infestation by the insect.

In embodiments of the insecticidal composition, the recombinant RNAmolecule includes at least one RNA strand having a sequence of about 95%to about 100% (e. g., about 95%, about 96%, about 97%, about 98%, about99%, or about 100%) identity or complementarity with a sequence selectedfrom the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46.In specific embodiments, the recombinant RNA molecule is a dsRNAincluding an RNA strand having a sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46. Inembodiments, the recombinant RNA molecule is a dsRNA of at least 50 basepairs in length. In embodiments of the method, the recombinant RNAmolecule is dsRNA. In embodiments, the recombinant RNA molecule is adsRNA which can be blunt-ended dsRNA, or can be dsRNA with an overhangat one or both ends (termini); the overhang can be a single nucleotideor 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, or more nucleotides, and can be located on the 5′ endor on the 3′ end of a strand. In embodiments, the recombinant RNAmolecule is a dsRNA which can be chemically synthesized, or can beproduced by expression in a microorganism, by expression in a plantcell, or by microbial fermentation. In embodiments, the recombinant RNAmolecule is a dsRNA of a length greater than that which is typical ofnaturally occurring regulatory small RNAs (such as endogenously producedsiRNAs and mature mRNAs), i. e., the polynucleotide is double-strandedRNA of al least about 30 contiguous base-pairs in length. Inembodiments, the recombinant RNA molecule is a dsRNA with a length ofbetween about 50 to about 500 base-pairs.

Embodiments of the insecticidal composition include those wherein theinsect is Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) and the target geneincludes a DNA sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ IDNOs:1-3; wherein the insect is Lygus hesperus (western tarnished plantbug) and the target gene includes a DNA sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:4-7, 43, and 44; wherein the insect isEuschistus heros (neotropical brown stink bug) and the target geneincludes a DNA sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ IDNOs:8-9; and wherein the insect is Plutella xylostella (diamondbackmoth) and the target gene includes a DNA sequence selected from thegroup consisting of SEQ ID NOs:10-12. Other embodiments of theinsecticidal composition include those wherein the insect is Spodopterafrugiperda (fall armyworm) and the recombinant RNA molecule includes atleast one RNA strand having a sequence of about 95% to about 100% (e.g., about 95%, about 96%, about 97%, about 98%, about 99%, or about100%) identity or complementarily with a sequence selected from thegroup consisting of SEQ ID NOs:17-19; wherein the insect is Lygushesperus (western tarnished plant bug) and the recombinant RNA moleculeincludes at least one RNA strand having a sequence of about 95% to about100% (e. g., about 95%, about 96%, about 97%, about 98%, about 99%, orabout 100%) identity or complementarity with a sequence selected fromthe group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:14-16, 22, 26, 45, and 46; whereinthe insect is Euschistus heros (neotropical brown stink bug) and therecombinant RNA molecule includes at least one RNA strand having asequence of about 95% to about 100% identity or complementarity with asequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:23-25; andwherein the insect is Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth) and therecombinant RNA molecule includes at least one RNA strand having asequence of about 95% to about 100% (e. g., about 95%, about 96%, about97%, about 98%, about 99%, or about 100%) identity or complementaritywith a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13,20-21, and 28-29. Specific embodiments of the insecticidal compositioninclude those wherein the insect is Spodoptera frugiperda (fallarmyworm) and the recombinant RNA molecule is a dsRNA including an RNAstrand having a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ IDNOs: 17-19; wherein the insect is Lygus hesperus (western tarnishedplant bug) and recombinant RNA molecule is a dsRNA including an RNAstrand having a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ IDNOs:14-16, 22, 26, 45, and 46; wherein the insect is Euschistus heros(neotropical brown stink bug) and recombinant RNA molecule is a dsRNAincluding an RNA strand having a sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:23-25; and wherein the insect is Plutellaxylostella (diamondback moth) and recombinant RNA molecule is a dsRNAincluding an RNA strand having a sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:13, 20-21, and 28-29. Other embodiments of theinsecticidal composition include those where the recombinant RNAmolecule has a sequence modified as described in Example 5 to eliminatematches to non-target organisms, such as the modified sequences (SEQ IDNOs:30-42) disclosed in Table 6.

In various embodiments the insecticidal composition includes aninsecticidally effective amount of a recombinant RNA molecule thatconsists of naturally occurring ribonucleotides, such as those found innaturally occurring RNA. In certain embodiments, the polynucleotide is acombination of ribonucleotides and deoxyribonucleotides, for example,synthetic polynucleotides consisting mainly of ribonucleotides but withone or more terminal deoxyribonucleotides or one or more terminaldideoxyribonucleotides. In certain embodiments, the polynucleotideincludes non-canonical nucleotides such as inosine, thiouridine, orpseudouridine. In certain embodiments, the polynucleotide includeschemically modified nucleotides. Examples of chemically modifiedoligonucleotides or polynucleotides are well known in the art; see, forexample, U.S. Patent Publication 2011/0171287, U.S. Patent Publication2011/0171176, U.S. Patent Publication 2011/0152353, T J.S. PatentPublication 2011/0152346, and U.S. Patent Publication 2011/0160082,which are herein incorporated by reference. Illustrative examplesinclude, but arc not limited to, the naturally occurring phosphodiesterbackbone of an oligonucleotide or polynucleotide which can be partiallyor completely modified with phosphorothioate, phosphorodithioate, ormethylphosphonate internucleotide linkage modifications, modifiednucleoside bases or modified sugars can be used in oligonucleotide orpolynucleotide synthesis, and oligonucleotides or polynucleotides can belabeled with a fluorescent moiety (e. g., fluorescein or rhodamine) orother label (e. g., biotin).

The recombinant RNA molecule of is provided by suitable means known toone in the art. Embodiments include those wherein the recombinant RNAmolecule is chemically synthesized (e.g., by in vitro transcription,such as transcription using a T7 polymerase or other polymerase),produced by expression in a microorganism or in cell culture (such asplant or insect cells grown in culture), produced by expression in aplant cell, or produced by microbial fermentation.

In embodiments the recombinant RNA molecule of use in this method isprovided as an isolated RNA fragment (not part of an expressionconstruct, i. e., lacking additional elements such as a promoter orterminator sequences). Such recombinant RNA molecules can be relativelyshort, such as single- or double-stranded RNA molecules of between about18 to about 300 or between about 50 to about 500 nucleotides (forsingle-stranded polynucleotides) or between about 18 to about 300 orbetween about 50 to about 500 base-pairs (for double-strandedpolynucleotides). Embodiments include those in which the polynucleotideis a dsRNA including a segment having a sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46.

In embodiments, the insecticidal composition is in a form selected fromthe group consisting of a solid, liquid, powder, suspension, emulsion,spray, encapsulation, microbeads, carrier particulates, film, matrix,soil drench, insect diet or insect bait, and seed treatment. Inembodiments, the insecticidal composition can be applied to a seed, e.g., by soaking the seed in a liquid insecticidal composition includingthe dsRNA, wherein the seed imbibes or takes up the dsRNA into the seedinterior or seed endosperm in an effective amount to provide improvedresistance to the insect pest by the seed or a plant or seedling grownfrom the seed. In some embodiments, the insecticidal composition isprovided in a form that is ingested by the insect, such as in a liquid,emulsion, or powder applied to a plant on which the insect feeds, or inthe form of bait. The insecticidal compositions can further include oneor more components selected from the group consisting of a carrieragent, a surfactant, an organosilicone, a polynucleotide herbicidalmolecule, a non-polynucleotide herbicidal molecule, a non-polynucleotidepesticide, a safener, an insect attractant, and an insect growthregulator. The insecticidal compositions can further include at leastone pesticidal agent selected from the group consisting of a patatin, aplant lectin, a phytoecdysteroid, a Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidalprotein, a Xenorhabdus insecticidal protein, a Photorhabdus insecticidalprotein, a Bacillus laterosporous insecticidal protein, and a Bacillussphaericus insecticidal protein. In embodiments, the combination of therecombinant RNA molecule and the pesticidal agent provides a level ofinsect control that is synergistic, i. e., greater than the sum of theeffects of the recombinant RNA molecule and the pesticidal agentcomponents if tested separately.

A related aspect of the invention is a plant treated with aninsecticidal composition as described herein, or a seed of the treatedplant, wherein the plant exhibits improved resistance to the insect. Inembodiments, the plant exhibiting improved resistance to the insect ischaracterized by improved yield, when compared to a plant not treatedwith the insecticidal composition.

Methods of Providing Plants with Improved Insect Resistance

Another aspect of the invention provides a method of providing a planthaving improved resistance to an insect, including expressing in theplant a recombinant DNA construct including DNA encoding RNA thatincludes at least one silencing element essentially identical oressentially complementary to a fragment of a target gene sequence of theinsect, wherein the target gene sequence is selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-12 and 43-44, and wherein ingestion of theRNA by the insect results in mortality or stunting in the insect.

In embodiments of the method, the silencing element has a sequence ofabout 95% to about 100% (e. g., about 95%, about 96%, about 97%, about98%, about 99%, or about 100%) identity or complementarity with asequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29,45, and 46. In specific embodiments, the silencing element is RNA thatforms double-stranded RNA from two separate, essentially complementarystrands, wherein at least one RNA strand includes a sequence of about95% to about 100% (e. g., about 95%, about 96%, about 97%, about 98%,about 99%, or about 100%) identity or complementarity with a sequenceselected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 45, and46. In other embodiments, the silencing clement is RNA that formsdouble-stranded RNA from a single self-hybridizing hairpin transcript,wherein one “arm” of the hairpin includes a sequence of about 95% toabout 100% (e. g., about 95%, about 96%, about 97%, about 98%, about99%, or about 100%) identity or complementarity with a sequence selectedfrom the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 45, and 46. Otherembodiments include those where the silencing element has a sequencemodified as described in Example 5 to eliminate matches to non-targetorganisms, such as the modified sequences (SEQ ID NOs:30-42) disclosedin Table 6.

In embodiments of the method, the recombinant DNA construct furtherincludes a heterologous promoter operably linked to the DNA encoding RNAthat includes at least one silencing element, wherein the heterologouspromoter is functional in a plant cell. Promoters functional in a plantcell include those listed under the heading “Promoters”.

In embodiments of the method, the recombinant DNA construct is expressedin the plant by means of transgenic expression or transient expression.In some embodiments, the method further includes expression in the plantof at least one pesticidal agent selected from the group consisting of apatatin, a plant lectin, a phytoecdysteroid, a Bacillus thuringiensisinsecticidal protein, a Xenorhabdus insecticidal protein, a Photorhabdusinsecticidal protein, a Bacillus laterosporous insecticidal protein, anda Bacillus sphaericus insecticidal protein. The pesticidal agent can beexpressed from the same recombinant DNA construct that includes the DNAencoding at least one silencing element, or from a different recombinantDNA construct.

A related aspect of the invention is a plant having improved resistanceto an insect, or the seed of such a plant, wherein the plant is providedby the method including expressing in the plant a recombinant DNAconstruct including DNA encoding RNA that includes at least onesilencing element essentially identical or essentially complementary toa fragment of a target gene sequence of the insect, wherein the targetgene sequence is selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-12and 43-44, and wherein ingestion of the RNA by the insect results inmortality or stunting in the insect. In embodiments, the plantexhibiting improved resistance to the insect is characterized byimproved yield, when compared to a plant not treated with theinsecticidal composition. Also encompassed by the invention are fruit,seed, or propagatable parts of the plant provided by this method andexhibiting improved resistance to the insect.

A related aspect of the invention is a plant or seedling having improvedresistance to an insect, wherein the plant or seedling is grown from aseed treated with a recombinant DNA construct including DNA encoding RNAthat includes at least one silencing element essentially identical oressentially complementary to a fragment of a target gene sequence of theinsect, wherein the target gene sequence is selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-12 and 43-44; alternatively the plant isgrown from a seed directly treated with the RNA that includes at leastone silencing element essentially identical or essentially complementaryto a fragment of a target gene sequence of the insect, wherein thetarget gene sequence is selected from the group consisting of SEQ IDNOs:1-12 and 43-44. In embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct (orthe encoded RNA that includes at least one silencing element) is appliedby soaking the seed in a liquid composition including the recombinantDNA construct (or the encoded RNA that includes at least one silencingelement), wherein the seed imbibes or takes up the DNA or encoded RNAinto the seed interior or seed endosperm in an effective amount toprovide improved resistance to the insect pest by a plant or seedlinggrown from the seed.

Recombinant DNA Constructs Encoding RNA for Insect Control

Another aspect of the invention provides a recombinant DNA constructincluding a heterologous promoter operably linked to DNA encoding an RNAtranscript including a sequence of about 95% to about 100% (e. g., about95%, about 96%, about 97%, about 98%, about 99%, or about 100%) identityor complementarity with a sequence selected from the group consisting ofSEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46.

In specific embodiments, the RNA transcript forms double-stranded RNAfrom two separate, essentially complementary strands (e. g., where onestrand is encoded on a separate DNA construct or where the two strandsare encoded on separate sections of the DNA encoding an RNA transcript,and which are separately transcribed or made separate, for example, bythe action of a recombinase or nuclease), wherein at least one RNAstrand includes a sequence of about 95% to about 100% (e. g., about 95%,about 96%, about 97%, about 98%, about 99%, or about 100%) identity orcomplementarity with a sequence selected from the group consisting ofSEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46. In other embodiments, theRNA transcript forms double-stranded RNA from a single self-hybridizinghairpin transcript, wherein one “arm” of the hairpin includes a sequenceof about 95% to about 100% (e. g., about 95%, about 96%, about 97%,about 98%, about 99%, or about 100%) identity or complementarity with asequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29,30-42, 45, and 46.

Embodiments of the recombinant DNA construct include those wherein theheterologous promoter is functional for expression of the RNA transcriptin a bacterium. In embodiments where the recombinant DNA construct is tobe expressed in a bacterium, the bacterium is selected from the groupconsisting of Escherichia coli, Bacillus species, Pseudomonas species,Xenorhabdus species, or Photorhabdus species. In other embodiments, therecombinant DNA construct includes a heterologous promoter that isfunctional in a plant cell. In embodiments, the recombinant DNAconstruct is contained in a recombinant vector, such as a recombinantplant virus vector or a recombinant baculovirus vector. In embodiments,the recombinant DNA construct is integrated into a plant chromosome orplastid, e. g., by stable transformation.

Related aspects of the invention include a transgenic plant cell havingin its genome the recombinant DNA construct, and a transgenic plantincluding such a transgenic plant cell. Transgenic plant cells andplants are made by methods known in the art, such as those describedunder the heading “Making and Using Transgenic Plant Cells andTransgenic Plants”. Further aspects of the invention include a commodityproduct produced from such a transgenic plant, and transgenic progenyseed or propagatable plant part of the transgenic plant.

Related Information and Techniques Plants

The methods and compositions described herein for treating andprotecting plants from insect infestations are useful across a broadrange of plants. Suitable plants in which the methods and compositionsdisclosed herein can be used include, but are not limited to, cerealsand forage grasses (rice, maize, wheat, barley, oat, sorghum, pearlmillet, finger millet, cool-season forage grasses, and bahiagrass),oilseed crops (soybean, oilseed brassicas including canola and oilseedrape, sunflower, peanut, flax, sesame, and safflower), legume grains andforages (common bean, cowpea, pea, faba bean, lentil, tepary bean,Asiatic beans, pigeonpea, vetch, chickpea, lupine, alfalfa, andclovers), temperate fruits and nuts (apple, pear, peach, plums, berrycrops, cherries, grapes, olive, almond, and Persian walnut), tropicaland subtropical fruits and nuts (citrus including limes, oranges, andgrapefruit; banana and plantain, pineapple, papaya, mango, avocado,kiwifruit, passionfruit, and persimmon), vegetable crops (solanaceousplants including tomato, eggplant, and peppers; vegetable brassicas;radish, carrot, cucurbits, alliums, asparagus, and leafy vegetables),sugar, tuber, and fiber crops (sugarcane, sugar beet, stevia, potato,sweet potato, cassava, and cotton), plantation crops, ornamentals, andturf grasses (tobacco, coffee, cocoa, tea, rubber tree, medicinalplants, ornamentals, and turf grasses), and forest tree species.

Additional Construct Elements

Embodiments of the polynucleotides and nucleic acid molecules of thisinvention can include additional elements, such as promoters, small RNArecognition sites, aptamers or ribozymes, additional and additionalexpression cassettes for expressing coding sequences (e. g., to expressa transgene such as an insecticidal protein or selectable marker) ornon-coding sequences (e. g., to express additional suppressionelements). For example, an aspect of this invention provides arecombinant DNA construct including a heterologous promoter operablylinked to DNA encoding an RNA transcript that includes a sequence ofabout 95% to about 100% identity or complementarity with a sequenceselected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42,45, and 46. In another embodiment, a recombinant DNA construct includinga promoter operably linked to DNA encoding: (a) an RNA transcript thatincludes a sequence of about 95% to about 100% identity orcomplementarity with a sequence selected from the group consisting ofSEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46, and (b) an aptamer, isstably integrated into the plant's genome from where RNA transcriptsincluding the RNA aptamer and the RNA silencing element are expressed incells of the plant; the aptamer serves to guide the RNA silencingelement to a desired location in the cell. In another embodiment,inclusion of one or more recognition sites for binding and cleavage by asmall RNA (e. g., by a miRNA or an siRNA that is expressed only in aparticular cell or tissue) allows for more precise expression patternsin a plant, wherein the expression of the recombinant DNA construct issuppressed where the small RNA is expressed. Such additional elementsare described below.

Promoters

Promoters of use in the invention are functional in the cell in whichthe construct is intended to be transcribed. Generally these promotersare heterologous promoters, as used in recombinant constructs, i. e.,they are not in nature found to be operably linked to the other nucleicelements used in the constructs of this invention. In variousembodiments, the promoter is selected from the group consisting of aconstitutive promoter, a spatially specific promoter, a temporallyspecific promoter, a developmentally specific promoter, and an induciblepromoter. In many embodiments the promoter is a promoter functional in aplant, for example, a pol II promoter, a pol III promoter, a pol IVpromoter, or a pol V promoter.

Non-constitutive promoters suitable for use with the recombinant DNAconstructs of this invention include spatially specific promoters,temporally specific promoters, and inducible promoters. Spatiallyspecific promoters can include organelle-, cell-, tissue-, ororgan-specific promoters (e.g., a plastid-specific, a root-specific, apollen-specific, or a seed-specific promoter for expression in plastids,roots, pollen, or seeds, respectively). In many cases a seed-specific,embryo-specific, aleurone-specific, or endosperm-specific promoter isespecially useful. Temporally specific promoters can include promotersthat tend to promote expression during certain developmental stages in aplant's growth cycle, or during different times of day or night, or atdifferent seasons in a year. Inducible promoters include promotersinduced by chemicals or by environmental conditions such as, but notlimited to, biotic or abiotic stress (e. g., water deficit or drought,heat, cold, high or low nutrient or salt levels, high or low lightlevels, or pest or pathogen infection). MicroRNA promoters are useful,especially those having a temporally specific, spatially specific, orinducible expression pattern; examples of miRNA promoters, as well asmethods for identifying miRNA promoters having specific expressionpatterns, are provided in U.S. Patent Application Publications2006/0200878, 2007/0199095, and 2007/0300329, which are specificallyincorporated herein by reference. An expression-specific promoter canalso include promoters that are generally constitutively expressed butat differing degrees or “strengths” of expression, including promoterscommonly regarded as “strong promoters” or as “weak promoters”.

Promoters of particular interest include the following examples: anopaline synthase promoter isolated from T-DNA of Agrobacterium; acauliflower mosaic virus 35S promoter; enhanced promoter elements orchimeric promoter elements such as an enhanced cauliflower mosaic virus(CaMV) 35S promoter linked to an enhancer element (an intron from heatshock protein 70 of Zea mays); root specific promoters such as thosedisclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,837,848; 6,437,217 and 6,426,446; a maizeL3 oleosin promoter disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,433,252; a promoter fora plant nuclear gene encoding a plastid-localized aldolase disclosed inU.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/0216189; cold-induciblepromoters disclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,084,089; salt-inducible promotersdisclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,140,078; light-inducible promotersdisclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,294,714; pathogen-inducible promotersdisclosed in U.S. Pat. No. 6,252,138; and water deficit-induciblepromoters disclosed in U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/0123347A1. All of the above-described patents and patent publicationsdisclosing promoters and their use, especially in recombinant DNAconstructs functional in plants are incorporated herein by reference.

Plant vascular- or phloem-specific promoters of interest include a rolCor rolA promoter of Agrobacterium rhizogenes, a promoter of aAgrobacterium tumefaciens T-DNA gene 5, the rice sucrose synthase RSs1gene promoter, a Commelina yellow mottle badnavirus promoter, a coconutfoliar decay virus promoter, a rice tungro bacilliform virus promoter,the promoter of a pea glutamine synthase GS3A gene, a invCD111 andinvCD141 promoters of a potato invertase genes, a promoter isolated fromArabidopsis shown to have phloem-specific expression in tobacco byKertbundit et al. (1991) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U S A., 88:5212-5216, aVAHOX1 promoter region, a pea cell wall invertase gene promoter, an acidinvertase gene promoter from carrot, a promoter of a sulfate transportergene Sultr1;3, a promoter of a plant sucrose synthase gene, and apromoter of a plant sucrose transporter gene.

Promoters suitable for use with a recombinant DNA construct orpolynucleotide of this invention include polymerase II (“pol II”)promoters and polymerase III (“pol III”) promoters. RNA polymerase IItranscribes structural or catalytic RNAs that arc usually shorter than400 nucleotides in length, and recognizes a simple run of T residues asa termination signal; it has been used to transcribe siRNA duplexes(see, e. g., Lu et al. (2004) Nucleic Acids Res., 32:e171). Pol IIpromoters are therefore preferred in certain embodiments where a shortRNA transcript is to be produced from a recombinant DNA construct ofthis invention. In one embodiment, the recombinant DNA constructincludes a pol II promoter to express an RNA transcript flanked byself-cleaving ribozyme sequences (e. g., self-cleaving hammerheadribozymes), resulting in a processed RNA, such as a single-stranded RNAthat binds to the transcript of the Leptinotarsa target gene, withdefined 5′ and 3′ ends, free of potentially interfering flankingsequences. An alternative approach uses pol III promoters to generatetranscripts with relatively defined 5′ and 3′ ends, i. e., to transcribean RNA with minimal 5′ and 3′ flanking sequences. In some embodiments,Pol III promoters (e. g., U6 or H1 promoters) are preferred for adding ashort AT-rich transcription termination site that results in 2 base-pairoverhangs (UU) in the transcribed RNA; this is useful, e. g., forexpression of siRNA-type constructs. Use of pol III promoters fordriving expression of siRNA constructs has been reported; see van deWetering et al. (2003) EMBO Rep., 4: 609-615, and Tuschl (2002) NatureBiotechnol., 20: 446-448. Baculovirus promoters such as baculoviruspolyhedrin and p10 promoters are known in the art and commerciallyavailable; see, e. g., Invitrogen's “Guide to Baculovirus ExpressionVector Systems (BEVS) and Insect Cell Culture Techniques”, 2002 (LifeTechnologies, Carlsbad, Calif.) and F. J. Haines et al. “BaculovirusExpression Vectors”, undated (Oxford Expression Technologies, Oxford,UK).

The promoter clement can include nucleic acid sequences that arc notnaturally occurring promoters or promoter elements or homologues thereofbut that can regulate expression of a gene. Examples of such “geneindependent” regulatory sequences include naturally occurring orartificially designed RNA sequences that include a ligand-binding regionor aptamer (see “Aptamers”, below) and a regulatory region (which can becis-acting). See, for example, Isaacs et al. (2004) Nat. Biotechnol.,22:841-847, Bayer and Smolke (2005) Nature Biotechnol., 23:337-343,Mandal and Breaker (2004) Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 5:451-463,Davidson and Ellington (2005) Trends Biotechnol., 23:109-112, Winkler etal. (2002) Nature, 419:952-956, Sudarsan et al. (2003) RNA, 9:644-647,and Mandal and Breaker (2004) Nature Struct. Mol. Biol., 11:29-35. Such“riboregulators” could be selected or designed for specific spatial ortemporal specificity, for example, to regulate translation of DNA thatencodes a silencing element for suppressing a target gene only in thepresence (or absence) of a given concentration of the appropriateligand. One example is a riboregulator that is responsive to anendogenous ligand (e. g., jasmonic acid or salicylic acid) produced bythe plant when under stress (e. g., abiotic stress such as water,temperature, or nutrient stress, or biotic stress such as attach bypests or pathogens); under stress, the level of endogenous ligandincreases to a level sufficient for the riboregulator to begintranscription of the DNA that encodes a silencing element forsuppressing a target gene.

Recombinase Sites

hi some embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct or polynucleotide ofthis invention includes DNA encoding one or more site-specificrecombinase recognition sites. In one embodiment, the recombinant DNAconstruct includes at least a pair of loxP sites, wherein site-specificrecombination of DNA between the loxP sites is mediated by a Crerecombinase. The position and relative orientation of the loxP sites isselected to achieve the desired recombination; for example, when theloxP sites are in the same orientation, the DNA between the loxP sitesis excised in circular form. In another embodiment, the recombinant DNAconstruct includes DNA encoding one loxP site; in the presence of Crerecombinase and another DNA with a loxP site, the two DNAs arerecombined.

Aptamers

In some embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct or polynucleotide ofthis invention includes DNA that is processed to an RNA aptamer, thatis, an RNA that binds to a ligand through binding mechanism that is notprimarily based on Watson-Crick base-pairing (in contrast, for example,to the base-pairing that occurs between complementary, anti-parallelnucleic acid strands to form a double-stranded nucleic acid structure).See, for example, Ellington and Szostak (1990) Nature, 346:818-822.Examples of aptamers can be found, for example, in the public AptamerDatabase, available on line at aptamer.icmb.utexas.edu (Lee et al.(2004) Nucleic Acids Res., 32(1):D95-100). Aptamers useful in theinvention can, however, be monovalent (binding a single ligand) ormultivalent (binding more than one individual ligand, e. g., binding oneunit of two or more different ligands).

Ligands useful in the invention include any molecule (or part of amolecule) that can be recognized and be bound by a nucleic acidsecondary structure by a mechanism not primarily based on Watson-Crickbase pairing. In this way, the recognition and binding of ligand andaptamer is analogous to that of antigen and antibody, or of biologicaleffector and receptor. Ligands can include single molecules (or part ofa molecule), or a combination of two or more molecules (or parts of amolecule), and can include one or more macromolecular complexes (e. g.,polymers, lipid bilayers, liposomes, cellular membranes or othercellular structures, or cell surfaces). Examples of specific ligandsinclude vitamins such as coenzyme B₁₂ and thiamine pyrophosphate, flavinmononucleotide, guanine, adenosine, S-adenosylmethionine,S-adenosylhomocysteine, coenzyme A, lysine, tyrosine, dopamine,glucosamine-6-phosphate, caffeine, theophylline, antibiotics such aschloramphenicol and neomycin, herbicides such as glyphosate and dicamba,proteins including viral or phage coat proteins and invertebrateepidermal or digestive tract surface proteins, and RNAs including viralRNA, transfer-RNAs (t-RNAs), ribosomal RNA (rRNA), and RNA polymerasessuch as RNA-dependent RNA polymerase (RdRP). One class of RNA aptamersuseful in the invention are “thermoswitches” that do not bind a ligandbut are thermally responsive, that is to say, the aptamer's conformationis determined by temperature; see, for example, Box 3 in Mandal andBreaker (2004) Nature Rev. Mol. Cell Biol., 5:451-463.

Transgene Transcription Units

In some embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct or polynucleotide ofthis invention includes a transgene transcription unit. A transgenetranscription unit includes DNA sequence encoding a gene of interest, e.g., a natural protein or a heterologous protein. A gene of interest canbe any coding or non-coding sequence from any species (including, butnot limited to, non-eukaryotes such as bacteria, and viruses; fungi,protists, plants, invertebrates, and vertebrates. Particular genes ofinterest are genes encoding at least one pesticidal agent selected fromthe group consisting of a patatin, a plant lectin, a phytoecdysteroid, aphytoecdysteroid, a Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal protein, aXenorhabdus insecticidal protein, a Photorhabdus insecticidal protein, aBacillus laterosporous insecticidal protein, and a Bacillus sphaericusinsecticidal protein. The transgene transcription unit can furtherinclude 5′ or 3′ sequence or both as required for transcription of thetransgene.

Introns

In some embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct or polynucleotide ofthis invention includes DNA encoding a spliceable intron. By “intron” isgenerally meant a segment of DNA (or the RNA transcribed from such asegment) that is located between exons (protein-encoding segments of theDNA or corresponding transcribed RNA), wherein, during maturation of themessenger RNA, the intron present is enzymatically “spliced out” orremoved from the RNA strand by a cleavage/ligation process that occursin the nucleus in eukaryotes. The term “intron” is also applied tonon-coding DNA sequences that are transcribed to RNA segments that canbe spliced out of a maturing RNA transcript, but are not introns foundbetween protein-coding exons. One example of these are spliceablesequences that that have the ability to enhance expression in plants (insome cases, especially in monocots) of a downstream coding sequence;these spliceable sequences are naturally located in the 5′ untranslatedregion of some plant genes, as well as in some viral genes (e. g., thetobacco mosaic virus 5′ leader sequence or “omega” leader described asenhancing expression in plant genes by Gallie and Walbot (1992) NucleicAcids Res., 20:4631-4638). These spliceable sequences or“expression-enhancing introns” can be artificially inserted in the 5′untranslated region of a plant gene between the promoter and anyprotein-coding exons. Examples of such expression-enhancing intronsinclude, but are not limited to, a maize alcohol dehydrogenase(Zm-Adh1), a maize Bronze-1 expression-enhancing intron, a rice actin 1(Os-Act1) intron, a Shrunken-1 (Sh-1) intron, a maize sucrose synthaseintron, a heat shock protein 18 (hsp18) intron, and an 82 kilodaltonheat shock protein (hsp82) intron. U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,593,874 and5,859,347, specifically incorporated by reference herein, describemethods of improving recombinant DNA constructs for use in plants byinclusion of an expression-enhancing intron derived from the 70kilodalton maize heat shock protein (hsp70) in the non-translated leaderpositioned 3′ from the gene promoter and 5′ from the firstprotein-coding exon.

Ribozymes

In some embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct or polynucleotide ofthis invention includes DNA encoding one or more ribozymes. Ribozymes ofparticular interest include a self-cleaving ribozyme, a hammerheadribozyme, or a hairpin ribozyme. In one embodiment, the recombinant DNAconstruct includes DNA encoding one or more ribozymes that serve tocleave the transcribed RNA to provide defined segments of RNA, such assilencing elements for suppressing a Leptinotarsa target gene.

Gene Suppression Elements

In some embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct or polynucleotide ofthis invention includes DNA encoding additional gene suppression elementfor suppressing a target gene other than a Leptinotarsa target gene. Thetarget gene to be suppressed can include coding or non-coding sequenceor both.

Suitable gene suppression elements are described in detail in U. S.Patent Application Publication 2006/0200878, which disclosure isspecifically incorporated herein by reference, and include one or moreof:

-   -   (a) DNA that includes at least one anti-sense DNA segment that        is anti-sense to at least one segment of the gene to be        suppressed;    -   (b) DNA that includes multiple copies of at least one anti-sense        DNA segment that is anti-sense to at least one segment of the        gene to be suppressed;    -   (c) DNA that includes at least one sense DNA segment that is at        least one segment of the gene to be suppressed;    -   (d) DNA that includes multiple copies of at least one sense DNA        segment that is at least one segment of the gene to be        suppressed;    -   (e) DNA that transcribes to RNA for suppressing the gene to be        suppressed by forming double-stranded RNA and includes at least        one anti-sense DNA segment that is anti-sense to at least one        segment of the gene to be suppressed and at least one sense DNA        segment that is at least one segment of the gene to be        suppressed;    -   (f) DNA that transcribes to RNA for suppressing the gene to be        suppressed by forming a single double-stranded RNA and includes        multiple serial anti-sense DNA segments that are anti-sense to        at least one segment of the gene to he suppressed and multiple        serial sense DNA segments that are at least one segment of the        gene to be suppressed;    -   (g) DNA that transcribes to RNA for suppressing the gene to be        suppressed by forming multiple double strands of RNA and        includes multiple anti-sense DNA segments that are anti-sense to        at least one segment of the gene to be suppressed and multiple        sense DNA segments that are at least one segment of the gene to        be suppressed, and wherein the multiple anti-sense DNA segments        and the multiple sense DNA segments are arranged in a series of        inverted repeats;    -   (h) DNA that includes nucleotides derived from a plant miRNA;    -   (i) DNA that includes nucleotides of a siRNA;    -   (j) DNA that transcribes to an RNA aptamer capable of binding to        a ligand; and    -   (k) DNA that transcribes to an RNA aptamer capable of binding to        a ligand, and DNA that transcribes to regulatory RNA capable of        regulating expression of the gene to be suppressed, wherein the        regulation is dependent on the conformation of the regulatory        RNA, and the conformation of the regulatory RNA is        allosterically affected by the binding slate of the RNA aptamer.

In some embodiments, an intron is used to deliver a gene suppressionelement in the absence of any protein-coding exons (coding sequence). Inone example, an intron, such as an expression-enhancing intron(preferred in certain embodiments), is interrupted by embedding withinthe intron a gene suppression element, wherein, upon transcription, thegene suppression element is excised from the intron. Thus,protein-coding exons are not required to provide the gene suppressingfunction of the recombinant DNA constructs disclosed herein.

Transcription Regulatory Elements

In some embodiments, the recombinant DNA construct or polynucleotide ofthis invention includes DNA encoding a transcription regulatory element.Transcription regulatory elements include elements that regulate theexpression level of the recombinant DNA construct of this invention(relative to its expression in the absence of such regulatory elements).Examples of suitable transcription regulatory elements includeriboswitches (cis- or trans-acting), transcript stabilizing sequences,and miRNA recognition sites, as described in detail in U. S. PatentApplication Publication 2006/0200878, specifically incorporated hereinby reference.

Making and Using Transgenic Plant Cells and Transgenic Plants

Transformation of a plant can include any of several well-known methodsand compositions. Suitable methods for plant transformation includevirtually any method by which DNA can be introduced into a cell. Onemethod of plant transformation is microprojectile bombardment, forexample, as illustrated in U.S. Pat. No. 5,015,580 (soybean), U.S. Pat.No. 5,538,880 (maize), U.S. Pat. No. 5,550,318 (maize), U.S. Pat. No.5,914,451 (soybean), U.S. Pat. No. 6,153,812 (wheat), U.S. Pat. No.6,160,208 (maize), U.S. Pat. No. 6,288,312 (rice), U.S. Pat. No.6,365,807 (rice), and U.S. Pat. No. 6,399,861 (maize), and U.S. Pat. No.6,403,865 (maize), all of which are incorporated by reference forenabling the production of transgenic plants.

Another useful method of plant transformation is Agrobacterium-mediatedtransformation by means of Agrobacterium containing a binary Ti plasmidsystem, wherein the Agrobacterium carries a first Ti plasmid and asecond, chimeric plasmid containing at least one T-DNA border of awild-type Ti plasmid, a promoter functional in the transformed plantcell and operably linked to a polynucleotide or recombinant DNAconstruct of this invention. See, for example, the binary systemdescribed in U.S. Pat. No. 5,159,135, incorporated by reference. Alsosee De Framond (1983) Biotechnology, 1:262-269; and Hoekema et al.,(1983) Nature, 303:179. In such a binary system, the smaller plasmid,containing the T-DNA border or borders, can be conveniently constructedand manipulated in a suitable alternative host, such as E. coli, andthen transferred into Agrobacterium.

Detailed procedures for Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of plants,especially crop plants, include procedures disclosed in U.S. Pat. Nos.5,004,863, 5,159,135, and 5,518,908 (cotton); U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,416,011,5,569,834, 5,824,877 and 6,384,301 (soybean); U.S. Pat. Nos. 5,591,616and 5,981,840 (maize); U.S. Pat. No. 5,463,174 (brassicas includingcanola), U.S. Pat. No. 7,026,528 (wheat), and U.S. Pat. No. 6,329,571(rice), and in U.S. Patent Application Publications 2004/0244075 (maize)and 2001/0042257 A1 (sugar beet), all of which are specificallyincorporated by reference for enabling the production of transgenicplants. U.S. Patent Application Publication 2011/0296555 discloses inExample 5 the transformation vectors (including the vector sequences)and detailed protocols for transforming maize, soybean, canola, cotton,and sugarcane) and is specifically incorporated by reference forenabling the production of transgenic plants. Similar methods have beenreported for many plant species, both dicots and monocots, including,among others, peanut (Cheng et al. (1996) Plant Cell Rep., 15: 653);asparagus (Bytebier et al. (1987) Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A.,84:5345); barley (Wan and Lemaux (1994) Plant Physiol., 104:37); rice(Toriyama et al. (1988) Bio/Technology, 6:10; Zhang et al. (1988) PlantCell Rep., 7:379; wheat (Vasil et al. (1992) Bio/Technology,10:667;Becker et al. (1994) Plant J. , 5:299), alfalfa (Masoud et al. (1996)Transgen. Res., 5:313); and tomato (Sun et al. (2006) Plant CellPhysiol., 47:426-431). Sec also a description of vectors, transformationmethods, and production of transformed Arabidopsis thaliana plants wheretranscription factors are constitutively expressed by a CaMV35Spromoter, in U.S. Patent Application Publication 2003/0167537 A1,incorporated by reference. Transformation methods specifically usefulfor solanaceous plants are well known in the art. See, for example,publicly described transformation methods for tomato (Sharma et al.(2009), J. Biosci., 34:423-433), eggplant (Arpaia et al. (1997) Theor.Appl. Genet., 95:329-334), potato (Bannerjee et al. (2006) Plant Sci.,170:732-738; Chakravarly et al. (2007) Amer. J. Potato Res., 84:301-311;S. Millam “Agrobacterium-mediated transformation of potato.” Chapter 19(pp.257-270), “Transgenic Crops of the World: Essential Protocols”, IanS. Curtis (editor), Springer, 2004), and peppers (Li et al. (2003) PlantCell Reports, 21: 785-788). Stably transgenic potato, tomato, andeggplant have been commercially introduced in various regions; see, e.g., K. Redenbaugh et al. “Safety Assessment of Genetically EngineeredFruits and Vegetables: A Case Study of the FLAVR SAVR™ Tomato”, CRCPress, Boca Raton, 1992, and the extensive publicly availabledocumentation of commercial genetically modified crops in the GM CropDatabase; see: CERA. (2012). GM Crop Database. Center for EnvironmentalRisk Assessment (CERA), ILSI Research Foundation, Washington D.C.,available electronically at www.cera-gmc.org/?action=gm_crop_database.Various methods of transformation of other plant species are well knownin the art, see, for example, the encyclopedic reference, “Compendium ofTransgenic Crop Plants”, edited by Chittaranjan Kole and Timothy C.Hall, Blackwell Publishing Ltd., 2008; ISBN 978-1-405-16924-0 (availableelectronically atmrw.interscience.wiley.com/einrw/9781405181099/htp/toc), which describestransformation procedures for cereals and forage grasses (rice, maize,wheat, barley, oat, sorghum, pearl millet, finger millet, cool-seasonforage grasses, and bahiagrass), oilseed crops (soybean, oilseedbrassicas, sunflower, peanut, flax, sesame, and safflower), legumegrains and forages (common bean, cowpea, pea, faba bean, lentil, teparybean, Asiatic beans, pigeonpea, vetch, chickpea, lupine, alfalfa, andclovers). temperate fruits and nuts (apple, pear, peach, plums, berrycrops, cherries, grapes, olive, almond, and Persian walnut), tropicaland subtropical fruits and nuts (citrus, grapefruit, banana andplantain, pineapple, papaya, mango, avocado, kiwifruit, passionfruit,and persimmon), vegetable crops (tomato, eggplant, peppers, vegetablebrassicas, radish, carrot, cucurbits, alliums, asparagus, and leafyvegetables), sugar, tuber, and fiber crops (sugarcane, sugar beet,stevia, potato, sweet potato, cassava, and cotton), plantation crops,ornamentals, and turf grasses (tobacco, coffee, cocoa, tea, rubber tree,medicinal plants, ornamentals, and turf grasses), and forest treespecies.

Transformation methods to provide transgenic plant cells and transgenicplants containing stably integrated recombinant DNA are preferablypracticed in tissue culture on media and in a controlled environment.“Media” refers to the numerous nutrient mixtures that are used to growcells in vitro, that is, outside of the intact living organism.Recipient cell targets include, but are not limited to, meristem cells,callus, immature embryos or parts of embryos, and gametic cells such asmicrospores, pollen, sperm, and egg cells. Any cell from which a fertileplant can be regenerated is contemplated as a useful recipient cell forpractice of this invention. Callus can be initiated from various tissuesources, including, but not limited to, immature embryos or parts ofembryos, seedling apical meristems, microspores, and the like. Thosecells which are capable of proliferating as callus can serve asrecipient cells for genetic transformation. Practical transformationmethods and materials for making transgenic plants of this invention (e.g., various media and recipient target cells, transformation of immatureembryos, and subsequent regeneration of fertile transgenic plants) aredisclosed, for example, in U.S. Pat. Nos. 6,194,636 and 6,232,526 andU.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/0216189, which are specificallyincorporated by reference.

In general transformation practice, DNA is introduced into only a smallpercentage of target cells in any one transformation experiment. Markergenes are generally used to provide an efficient system foridentification of those cells that are stably transformed by receivingand integrating a transgenic DNA construct into their genomes. Preferredmarker genes provide selective markers which confer resistance to aselective agent, such as an antibiotic or herbicide. Any of theantibiotics or herbicides to which a plant cell is resistant can be auseful agent for selection. Potentially transformed cells are exposed tothe selective agent. In the population of surviving cells will be thosecells where, generally, the resistance-conferring gene is integrated andexpressed at sufficient levels to permit cell survival. Cells can betested further to confirm stable integration of the recombinant DNA.Commonly used selective marker genes include those conferring resistanceto antibiotics such as kanamycin or paromomycin (nptII), hygromycin B(aph IV) and gentamycin (aac3 and aacC4) or resistance to herbicidessuch as glufosinate (bar or pat) and glyphosate (EPSPS). Examples ofuseful selective marker genes and selection agents are illustrated inU.S. Pat. Nos. 5,550,318, 5,633,435, 5,780,708, and 6,118,047, all ofwhich are specifically incorporated by reference. Screenable markers orreporters, such as markers that provide an ability to visually identifytransformants can also be employed. Examples of useful screenablemarkers include, for example, a gene expressing a protein that producesa detectable color by acting on a chromogenic substrate (e. g., betaglucuronidase (GUS) (uidA) or luciferase (kw)) or that itself isdetectable, such as green fluorescent protein (GFP) (gfp) or animmunogenic molecule. Those of skill in the art will recognize that manyother useful markers or reporters are available for use.

Detecting or measuring transcription of a recombinant DNA construct in atransgenic plant cell can be achieved by any suitable method, includingprotein detection methods (e. g., western blots, ELISAs, and otherimmunochemical methods), measurements of enzymatic activity, or nucleicacid detection methods (e. g., Southern blots, northern blots, PCR,RT-PCR, fluorescent in situ hybridization).

Other suitable methods for detecting or measuring transcription in aplant cell of a recombinant polynucleotide of this invention targettingan insect target gene include measurement of any other trait that is adirect or proxy indication of the level of expression of the target genein the insect, relative to the level of expression observed in theabsence of the recombinant polynucleotide, e. g., growth rates,mortality rates, or reproductive or recruitment rates of the insect, ormeasurements of injury (e. g., root injury) or yield loss in a plant orfield of plants infested by the insect. In general, suitable methods fordetecting or measuring transcription in a plant cell of a recombinantpolynucleotide of interest include, e. g., gross or microscopicmorphological traits, growth rates, yield, reproductive or recruitmentrates, resistance to pests or pathogens, or resistance to biotic orabiotic stress (e. g., water deficit stress, salt stress, nutrientstress, heat or cold stress). Such methods can use direct measurementsof a phenotypic trait or proxy assays (e. g., in plants, these assaysinclude plant part assays such as leaf or root assays to determinetolerance of abiotic stress). Such methods include direct measurementsof resistance to an invertebrate pest or pathogen (e. g., damage toplant tissues) or proxy assays (e. g., plant yield assays, orinvertebrate pest bioassays such as the Western corn rootworm(Diabrotica virgifera virgifera LeConte) larval bioassay described inInternational Patent Application Publication WO2005/110068 A2 and U. S.Patent Application Publication US 2006/0021087 A1, specificallyincorporated by reference, or the soybean cyst nematode bioassaydescribed by Steeves et al. (2006) Funci. Plant Biol., 33:991-999,wherein cysts per plant, cysts per gram root, eggs per plant, eggs pergram root, and eggs per cyst are measured, or the bioassays describedherein in the working Examples.

The recombinant DNA constructs of this invention can be stacked withother recombinant DNA for imparting additional traits (e. g., in thecase of transformed plants, traits including herbicide resistance, pestresistance, cold germination tolerance, water deficit tolerance, and thelike) for example, by expressing or suppressing other genes. Constructsfor coordinated decrease and increase of gene expression are disclosedin U.S. Patent Application Publication 2004/0126845 A1, specificallyincorporated by reference.

Seeds of fertile transgenic plants can be harvested and used to growprogeny generations, including hybrid generations, of transgenic plantsof this invention that include the recombinant DNA construct in theirgenome. Thus, in addition to direct transformation of a plant with arecombinant DNA construct of this invention, transgenic plants of thisinvention can be prepared by crossing a first plant having therecombinant DNA with a second plant lacking the construct. For example,the recombinant DNA can be introduced into a plant line that is amenableto transformation to produce a transgenic plant, which can be crossedwith a second plant line to introgress the recombinant DNA into theresulting progeny. A transgenic plant of this invention can be crossedwith a plant line having other recombinant DNA that confers one or moreadditional trait(s) (such as, but not limited to, herbicide resistance,pest or disease resistance, environmental stress resistance, modifiednutrient content, and yield improvement) to produce progeny plantshaving recombinant DNA that confers both the desired target sequenceexpression behavior and the additional trait(s).

In such breeding for combining traits the transgenic plant donating theadditional trait can be a male line (pollinator) and the transgenicplant carrying the base traits can be the female line. The progeny ofthis cross segregate such that some of the plant will carry the DNA forboth parental traits and some will carry DNA for one parental trait;such plants can be identified by markers associated with parentalrecombinant DNA Progeny plants carrying DNA for both parental traits canbe crossed back into the female parent line multiple times, e. g.,usually 6 to 8 generations, to produce a homozygous progeny plant withsubstantially the same genotype as one original transgenic parental lineas well as the recombinant DNA of the other transgenic parental line.

Yet another aspect of this invention is a transgenic plant grown fromthe transgenic seed of this invention. This invention contemplatestransgenic plants grown directly from transgenic seed containing therecombinant DNA as well as progeny generations of plants, includinginbred or hybrid plant lines, made by crossing a transgenic plant growndirectly from transgenic seed to a second plant not grown from the sametransgenic seed. Crossing can include, for example, the following steps:

-   -   (a) plant seeds of the first parent plant (e. g., non-transgenic        or a transgenic) and a second parent plant that is transgenic        according to the invention;    -   (b) grow the seeds of the first and second parent plants into        plants that bear flowers;    -   (c) pollinate a flower from the first parent with pollen from        the second parent; and    -   (d) harvest seeds produced on the parent plant hearing the        fertilized flower.

It is often desirable to introgress recombinant DNA into elitevarieties, e. g., by backcrossing, to transfer a specific desirabletrait from one source to an inbred or other plant that lacks that trait.This can be accomplished, for example, by first crossing a superiorinbred (“A”) (recurrent parent) to a donor inbred (“B”) (non-recurrentparent), which carries the appropriate gene(s) for the trait inquestion, for example, a construct prepared in accordance with thecurrent invention. The progeny of this cross first are selected in theresultant progeny for the desired trait to be transferred from thenon-recurrent parent “B”, and then the selected progeny arc mated backto the superior recurrent parent “A”. After five or more backcrossgenerations with selection for the desired trait, the progeny can beessentially hemizygous for loci controlling the characteristic beingtransferred, but are like the superior parent for most or almost allother genes. The last backcross generation would be selfed to giveprogeny which are pure breeding for the gene(s) being transferred, i.e., one or more transformation events.

Through a series of breeding manipulations, a selected DNA construct canbe moved from one line into an entirely different line without the needfor further recombinant manipulation. One can thus produce inbred plantswhich are true breeding for one or more DNA constructs. By crossingdifferent inbred plants, one can produce a large number of differenthybrids with different combinations of DNA constructs. In this way,plants can be produced which have the desirable agronomic propertiesfrequently associated with hybrids (“hybrid vigor”), as well as thedesirable characteristics imparted by one or more DNA constructs.

In certain transgenic plant cells and transgenic plants of thisinvention, it is sometimes desirable to concurrently express a gene ofinterest while also modulating expression of a Leptinotarsa target gene.Thus, in some embodiments, the transgenic plant contains recombinant DNAfurther including a gene expression element for expressing at least onegene of interest, and transcription of the recombinant DNA construct ofthis invention is preferably effected with concurrent transcription ofthe gene expression element.

In some embodiments, the recombinant DNA constructs of this inventioncan be transcribed in any plant cell or tissue or in a whole plant ofany developmental stage. Transgenic plants can be derived from anymonocot or dicot plant, such as, but not limited to, plants ofcommercial or agricultural interest, such as crop plants (especiallycrop plants used for human food or animal feed), wood- or pulp-producingtrees, vegetable plants, fruit plants, and ornamental plants. Examplesof plants of interest include grain crop plants (such as wheat, oat,barley, maize, rye, triticale, rice, millet, sorghum, quinoa, amaranth,and buckwheat); forage crop plants (such as forage grasses and foragedicots including alfalfa, vetch, clover, and the like); oilseed cropplants (such as cotton, safflower, sunflower, soybean, canola, rapeseed,flax, peanuts, and oil palm); tree nuts (such as walnut, cashew,hazelnut, pecan, almond, and the like); sugarcane, coconut, date palm,olive, sugarbeet, tea, and coffee; wood- or pulp-producing trees;vegetable crop plants such as legumes (for example, beans, peas,lentils, alfalfa, peanut), lettuce, asparagus, artichoke, celery,carrot, radish, the brassicas (for example, cabbages, kales, mustards,and other leafy brassicas, broccoli, cauliflower, Brussels sprouts,turnip, kohlrabi), edible cucurbits (for example, cucumbers, melons,summer squashes, winter squashes), edible alliums (for example, onions,garlic, leeks, shallots, chives), edible members of the Solanaceae (forexample, tomatoes, eggplants, potatoes, peppers, groundcherries), andedible members of the Chenopodiaceae (for example, beet, chard, spinach,quinoa, amaranth); fruit crop plants such as apple, pear, citrus fruits(for example, orange, lime, lemon, grapefruit, and others), stone fruits(for example, apricot, peach, plum, nectarine), banana, pineapple,grape, kiwifruit, papaya, avocado, and berries; plants grown for biomassor biofuel (for example, Miscanthus grasses, switchgrass, jatropha, oilpalm, eukaryotic microalgae such as Botryococcus braunii, Chlorellaspp., and Dunaliella spp., and eukaryotic macroalgae such as Gracilariaspp., and Sargassum spp.); and ornamental plants including ornamentalflowering plants, ornamental trees and shrubs, ornamental groundcovers,and ornamental grasses.

This invention also provides commodity products produced from atransgenic plant cell, plant, or seed of this invention, including, butnot limited to harvested leaves, roots, shoots, tubers, stems, fruits,seeds, or other parts of a plant, meals, oils, extracts, fermentation ordigestion products, crushed or whole grains or seeds of a plant, or anyfood or non-food product including such commodity products produced froma transgenic plant cell, plant, or seed of this invention. The detectionof one or more of nucleic acid sequences of the recombinant DNAconstructs of this invention in one or more commodity or commodityproducts contemplated herein is de facto evidence that the commodity orcommodity product contains or is derived from a transgenic plant cell,plant, or seed of this invention.

Generally a transgenic plant having in its genome a recombinant DNAconstruct of this invention exhibits increased resistance to an insectinfestation. In various embodiments, for example, where the transgenicplant expresses a recombinant DNA construct of this invention that isstacked with other recombinant DNA for imparting additional traits, thetransgenic plant has at least one additional altered trait, relative toa plant lacking the recombinant DNA construct, selected from the groupof traits consisting of:

(a) improved abiotic stress tolerance;

(b) improved biotic stress tolerance;

(c) modified primary metabolite composition;

(d) modified secondary metabolite composition;

(e) modified trace element, carotenoid, or vitamin composition;

(f) improved yield;

(g) improved ability to use nitrogen, phosphate, or other nutrients;

(h) modified agronomic characteristics;

(i) modified growth or reproductive characteristics; and

(j) improved harvest, storage, or processing quality.

In some embodiments, the transgenic plant is characterized by: improvedtolerance of abiotic stress (e. g., tolerance of water deficit ordrought, heat, cold, non-optimal nutrient or salt levels, non-optimallight levels) or of biotic stress (e. g., crowding, allelopathy, orwounding); by a modified primary metabolite (e. g., fatty acid, oil,amino acid, protein, sugar, or carbohydrate) composition; a modifiedsecondary metabolite (e. g., alkaloids, terpenoids, polyketides,non-ribosomal peptides, and secondary metabolites of mixed biosyntheticorigin) composition; a modified trace element (e. g., iron, zinc),carotenoid (e. g., beta-carotene, lycopene, lutein, zeaxanthin, or othercarotenoids and xanthophylls), or vitamin (e. g., tocopherols)composition; improved yield (e. g., improved yield under non-stressconditions or improved yield under biotic or abiotic stress); improvedability to use nitrogen, phosphate, or other nutrients; modifiedagronomic characteristics (e. g., delayed ripening; delayed senescence;earlier or later maturity; improved shade tolerance; improved resistanceto root or stalk lodging; improved resistance to “green snap” of stems;modified photoperiod response); modified growth or reproductivecharacteristics (e. g., intentional dwarfing; intentional malesterility, useful, e. g., in improved hybridization procedures; improvedvegetative growth rate; improved germination; improved male or femalefertility); improved harvest, storage, or processing quality (e. g.,improved resistance to pests during storage, improved resistance tobreakage, improved appeal to consumers); or any combination of thesetraits.

In another embodiment, transgenic seed, or seed produced by thetransgenic plant, has modified primary metabolite (e. g., fatty acid,oil, amino acid, protein, sugar, or carbohydrate) composition, amodified secondary metabolite composition, a modified trace element,carotenoid, or vitamin composition, an improved harvest, storage, orprocessing quality, or a combination of these. In another embodiment, itcan be desirable to change levels of native components of the transgenicplant or seed of a transgenic plant, for example, to decrease levels ofan allergenic protein or glycoprotein or of a toxic metabolite.

Generally, screening a population of transgenic plants each regeneratedfrom a transgenic plant cell is performed to identify transgenic plantcells that develop into transgenic plants having the desired trait. Thetransgenic plants are assayed to detect an enhanced trait, e. g.,enhanced water use efficiency, enhanced cold tolerance, increased yield,enhanced nitrogen use efficiency, enhanced seed protein, and enhancedseed oil. Screening methods include direct screening for the trait in agreenhouse or field trial or screening for a surrogate trait. Suchanalyses are directed to detecting changes in the chemical composition,biomass, physiological properties, or morphology of the plant. Changesin chemical compositions such as nutritional composition of grain aredetected by analysis of the seed composition and content of protein,free amino acids, oil, free fatty acids, starch, tocopherols, or othernutrients. Changes in growth or biomass characteristics are detected bymeasuring plant height, stem diameter, internode length, root and shootdry weights, and (for grain-producing plants such as maize, rice, orwheat) ear or seed head length and diameter. Changes in physiologicalproperties are identified by evaluating responses to stress conditions,e. g., assays under imposed stress conditions such as water deficit,nitrogen or phosphate deficiency, cold or hot growing conditions,pathogen or insect attack, light deficiency, or increased plant density.Other selection properties include days to flowering, days to pollenshed, days to fruit maturation, fruit or tuber quality or amountproduced, days to silking in maize, leaf extension rate, chlorophyllcontent, leaf temperature, stand, seedling vigor, internode length,plant height, leaf number, leaf area, tillering, brace roots, stayinggreen, stalk lodging, root lodging, plant health, fertility, green snap,and pest resistance. In addition, phenotypic characteristics ofharvested fruit, seeds, or tubers can be evaluated.

EXAMPLES Example 1

This example illustrates non-limiting embodiments of coding DNAsequences useful as target genes for controlling insect species and formaking compositions and plants of this invention, and identifies dsRNAtrigger sequences useful for controlling insect species. Orthologues togenes previously demonstrated to be efficacious targets forRNAi-mediated mortality in western corn rootworm were identified frominsect species that have not previously been reported to be susceptibleto orally delivered RNA. These orthologous target genes and examples ofdsRNA trigger sequences are provided in Table 1.

TABLE 1 Target Gene Trigger SEQ ID Target Target Gene Source SpeciesTarget Gene Trigger SEQ ID Trigger NO. Gene ID (common name) AnnotationID NO.* size (bp) 1 CG3762 Spodoptera frugiperda V-ATPase subunit AT34640 17 300 (fall armyworm) 2 F38E11 Spodoptera frugiperda COPIcoatomer T34644 19 301 (fall armyworm) beta prime subunit 3 CG6223Spodoptera frugiperda COPI coatomer T34642 18 301 (fall armyworm) betasubunit 4 CG3762 Lygus hesperus V-ATPase subunit A T34617 15 300(western tarnished plant bug) 5 CG2746 Lygus hesperus ribosomal proteinT34616 14 298 (western tarnished plant bug) L19 6 F38E11 Lygus hesperusCOPI coatomer T34622 16 300 (western tarnished plant bug) beta primesubunit 7 AT20865p Lygus hesperus ubiquitin C T42772 22 257 (westerntarnished plant bug) 7 AT20865p Lygus hesperus ubiquitin C T44045 26 302(western tarnished plant bug) 8 CG10370 Euschistus heros TAT bindingT43718 23 300 (neotropical brown stink bug) protein 9 AT20865pEuschistus heros ubiquitin C T43720 24 300 (neotropical brown stink bug)9 AT20865p Euschistus heros ubiquitin C T44042 25 302 (neotropical brownstink bug) 10 CG3762 Plutella xylostella V-ATPase subunit A T42014 20302 (diamondback moth) 10 CG3762 Plutella xylostella V-ATPase subunit AT42017 21 301 (diamondback moth) 10 CG3762 Plutella xylostella V-ATPasesubunit A 133310 29 300 (diamondback moth) 11 F38E11.5 Plutellaxylostella COPI coatomer T32937 13 302 (diamondback moth) beta primesubunit 12 CG6223 Plutella xylostella COPI coatomer T32938 28 302(diamondback moth) beta subunit 43 CG6223 Lygus hesperus COPI coatomerT34619 45 301 (western tarnished plant bug) beta subunit 44 AT20865pLygus hesperus ubiquitin C variant T42768 46 255 (western tarnishedplant bug) (fragment) *Trigger sequences are provided for the sensestrand of the dsRNA trigger in 5′ to 3′ direction.

The dsRNA trigger sequences that are confirmed to be effective insuppressing a target gene in a sequence-specific manner are useful foridentifying efficacious RNA delivery agents and formulations. Theinsecticidal activity of formulations containing the dsRNA triggers canbe optimized by various techniques, such as modifying the chemicalentities in the formulation or modifying the ratio of the chemicalcomponents in the formulation. Non-limiting examples of delivery agentsand formulations are provided in Examples 6 and 8.

Example 2

This example illustrates non-limiting embodiments of dsRNA triggersequences useful for suppressing or silencing a target gene in an insectcell or causing stunting or mortality in an insect, and methods forvalidating dsRNA trigger efficacy or for causing stunting or mortalityin an insect. More specifically this example illustrates use of dsRNAtriggers for sequence-specific reduction of target gene mRNA transcriptlevel in insect cells.

Cultured Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm, FAW) SF9 cells wereincubated with the dsRNA triggers T34640 (SEQ ID NO:17, targettingV-ATPase A subunit), T34642 (SEQ Ill NO:18, targetting COPI coatomer B(beta) subunit), or T34644 (SEQ ID NO:19, targetting COPI coatomer (betaprime) subunit), or with a control trigger T35763 (SEQ ID NO:27, a 300bp dsRNA trigger targetting green fluorescent protein); see Table 1. ThedsRNA triggers were formulated with the commercial transfection agentCellfectin® II (Life Technologies, Inc., Grand Island, N.Y. 14072). FIG.1 depicts the results of the transfection experiments, demonstratingtarget-gene-specific suppression (reduction of target gene mRNA levelsmeasured by Quantigene assays) by the dsRNA triggers in the insectcells. The control dsRNA trigger T35763 had no effect on the targettedinsect gene mRNA levels.

Similar experiments were carried out with Plutella xylostella(diamondback moth, DBM) cells. The results demonstrate a similartarget-gene-specific cytotoxic response to the DBM triggers but not to anon-specific trigger targetting green fluorescent protein. CulturedPlutella xylostella (diamondback moth) PxE-PO #5A3 cells were incubatedwith the dsRNA triggers T42017 (SEQ ID NO:21, targetting V-ATPasesubunit A), T33310 (SEQ ID NO:29, targetting V-ATPase subunit A), T32938(SEQ ID NO:28, targetting COPI coatomer beta subunit), and T32937 (SEQID NO:13, targetting COPI coatomer beta prime subunit), or with acontrol trigger T35763 (SEQ ID NO:27, a 300 bp dsRNA trigger targettinggreen fluorescent protein); see Table 1. The dsRNA triggers wereformulated with the commercial transfection agent Cellfectin® II (LifeTechnologies, Inc., Grand Island, N.Y. 14072). FIG. 2 depicts theresults of the transfection experiments, demonstratingtarget-gene-specific suppression (reduction of target gene mRNA levelsmeasured by Quantigene assays) by the dsRNA triggers in the insectcells. The control dsRNA trigger T35763 had no effect on the targettedinsect gene mRNA levels. In this particular experiment, some reductionof mRNA levels was observed in all DBM-specific trigger treatmentscompared to cellfectin II or cellfectin II+T35763 (SEQ ID NO:27)treatments. Visual pathology was apparent for T32937 (SEQ ID NO:13,targetting COPI coatomer beta prime subunit) and T32938 (SEQ ID NO:28,targetting COPI coatomer beta subunit) treatments with some cell death,rounding, and dislodging occurring in transfected wells at 48 hourspost-transfection. Treatments with T42017 (SEQ ID NO:21) and T33310 (SEQID NO:29) showed knockdown of the target gene, V-ATPase subunit A mRNA,but no visual pathology was apparent in cells transfected with thosetriggers.

Example 3

This example illustrates non-limiting embodiments of dsRNA triggersequences useful for suppressing or silencing a target gene in an insectcell or causing stunting or mortality in an insect, and methods forvalidating dsRNA trigger efficacy or for causing stunting or mortalityin an insect. More specifically this example illustrates oral deliveryof dsRNA triggers for causing stunting or mortality in insects.

An assay using Euschistus heros (neotropical brown stink bug, NBSB)nymphs fed on an artificial diet was used for testing the efficacy ofdsRNA triggers designed specifically to target Euschistus heros genes.Using this assay, a ˜500 base pair dsRNA trigger, T33199, which targetsthe E. heros ubiquitin C gene, was observed to effect a dose-dependentstunting and mortality response in E. heros nymphs. A shorter (302 bp)dsRNA trigger, T44042 (SEQ ID NO:26) was designed, based on the sequenceof T33199, for formulating for oral or topical delivery.

Example 4

This example illustrates non-limiting embodiments of dsRNA triggersequences useful for suppressing or silencing a target gene in an insectcell or causing stunting or mortality in an insect, and methods forvalidating dsRNA trigger efficacy or for causing stunting or mortalityin an insect. More specifically this example illustrates embodiments ofdsRNA triggers for causing stunting or mortality in insects, anddemonstrates systemic RNAi efficacy of these triggers.

Table 2 provides dsRNA triggers tested by microinjection delivery inLygus hesperus (Western tarnished plant bug) nymphs. Thenon-Lygus-specific trigger T35763 (SEQ ID NO:27, a 300 bp dsRNA triggertargetting green fluorescent Protein) was used as a control.

TABLE 2 Amount Trigger injected per SEQ ID insect NO.* Trigger ID Lygushesperus Target Gene (micrograms) 14 T34616 ribosomal protein rpL19 1-215 T34617 V-ATPase subunit A 1-2 16 T34622 COPI coatomer B′ (beta prime)1-2 subunit 22 T42772 ubiquitin C 1-2

Table 3 presents mortality results for dsRNA triggers, T34617 (SEQ IDNO:15, targetting Lygus hesperus V-ATPase subunit A), and T34622 (SEQ IDNO:16, targetting Lygus hesperus COPI coatomer beta prime subunit)tested by microinjection delivery in Lygus hesperus (Western tarnishedplant hug) nymphs. Control nymphs were microinjected with T35763(targetting green fluorescent protein) or with deionized water.Increased percent mortality by day was observed forLygus-target-gene-specific treatment groups (T34617 and T34622) comparedto negative control treatment groups over the 5-day observation period.

TABLE 3 Total Lygus Trigger Lygus hesperus Trigger SEQ ID hesperusPercent mortality, shown by days after injection nymphs ID NO.* Targetgene 0 1 2 3 4 5 injected T34617 15 V-ATPase 12 25 58 75 88 100 24subunit A T34622 16 COPI 8 12 67 96 96 100 24 coatomer beta primesubunit 135763 27 GFP 12 12 29 50 58 67 24 dH₂O (none) (none) 0 5 20 4555 75 20

Table 4 presents mortality results for dsRNA triggers, T34616 (SEQ IDNO:14, targetting Lygus hesperus ribosomal protein rpL19), T34622 (SEQID NO:16, targetting Lygus hesperus COPI coatomer beta prime subunit),and T42772 (SEQ ID NO:22, targetting Lygus hesperus ubiquitin C), testedby microinjection delivery in Lygus hesperus (Western tarnished plantbug) nymphs. Control nymphs were microinjected with T35763 (targettinggreen fluorescent protein). Increased percent mortality by day wasobserved for Lygus-target-gene-specific treatment groups (T34616,T34622, and T42772) compared to the negative control (T35763) treatmentgroup over the 6-day observation period. Repeat activity of T34622confirmed activity of this trigger observed in the earlier trial (Table3).

TABLE 4 Total Lygus Trigger Lygus hesperus Trigger SEQ ID hesperusPercent mortality, shown by days after injection nymphs ID NO: Targetgene 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 injected T34616 14 ribosomal 18 77 77 91 100 100 10022 protein rpL19 T34622 16 COPT 12 50 83 88 100 100 100 24 coatomer betaprime subunit T42772 22 ubiquitin C 17 61 100 100 100 100 100 23 T3576327 GFP 8 22 44 48 56 56 61 23

Example 5

This example discloses embodiments related to polynucleotide moleculeshaving a nucleotide sequence containing specific modifications such asnucleotide substitutions. Embodiments of such modifications includemodified dsRNA triggers that provide improved sequence discriminationbetween the intended target gene of the insect pest of interest, andgenetic sequences of other, non-target species.

Table 5 identifies examples of matches between the sequence of a targetgene provided in Table 1 and a sequence identified in a non-targetorganism (NTO), where the match is a segment of at least 19 contiguousnucleotides. Table 5 further provides examples of sequence modifications(e. g., nucleotide changes at a specified location in the originaltarget gene sequence) to eliminate the sequence match to a non-targetorganism.

TABLE 5 Nucleotide Length (in position nucleotides) where of Nucleotidechange is Nucleotide Target contiguous position of made to change madeGene segment beginning eliminate to eliminate SEQ Non-Target matching ofmatch to match to ID Target Organism the NTO matching NTO NTO NO:Species (NTO) species sequence segment sequence sequence 1 SpodopteraDanaus plexippus 19 398 408 G-A frugiperda Danaus plerippus 23 562 575C-T Danaus plexippus 26 604 617 A-T Danaus plexippus 20 631 642 C-TDanaus plexippus 20 661 671 A-T Danaus plexippus 28 695 710 T-A Danausplexippus 90 727 737 T-A Danaus plexippus 20 793 802 A-G Danausplexippus 20 847 858 C-T Apis mellifera 19 891 900 T-A Homo sapiens 21905 900 T-A Danaus plexippus 19 968 977 T-C Danaus plexippus 23 10241035 G-A Danaus plexippus 48 1078 1092 C-T 1110 G-A 2 Spodoptera Danausplexippus 90 241 250 T-C frugiperda Danaus plexippus 26 274 289 G-A Homosapiens 19 516 526 A-G Danaus plexippus 26 1615 1628 A-G Danausplexippus 20 1771 1780 C-T Danaus plexippus 90 1810 1820 T-C Apismellifera 19 1870 1879 G-A Homo sapiens 20 1933 1945 G-A Apis mellifera19 1934 1946 C-T Homo sapiens 71 1935 1946 C-T Apis mellifera 20 19361946 C-T Homo sapiens 20 1936 1946 C-T Homo sapiens 19 1936 1946 C-THomo sapiens 19 1937 1946 C-T Homo sapiens 19 1939 1946 C-T Homo sapiens19 1942 1946 C-T Apis mellifera 19 2681 2690 T-C 3 Spodoptera Danausplexippus 19 62 72 C-T frugiperda Homo sapiens 19 503 512 C-G Homosapiens 19 544 553 A-G Bombus impatiens 22 659 669 G-A Bombus terrestris22 659 669 G-A Danaus plexippus 26 859 873 C-T Danaus plexippus 19 925934 G-A Homo sapiens 19 927 934 G-A Homo sapiens 19 934 945 G-A Danausplexippus 19 935 945 G-A Danaus plexippus 90 936 945 G-A Danausplexippus 26 952 964 G-A Homo sapiens 19 974 983 T-A Homo sapiens 191461 1470 G-T Homo sapiens 19 1712 1799 G-A Homo sapiens 90 1713 1799G-A Homo sapiens 20 2223 2232 G-A Homo sapiens 19 2242 2256 G-A Danausplexippus 20 2245 2256 G-A Danaus plexippus 94 2307 2319 G-C Danausplexippus 20 2332 2340 C-T Dartaus plexippus 29 2503 2517 C-T Danausplexippus 41 2626 2633 T-C 4 Lygus Danaus plexippus 90 323 333 G-Ahesperus Bombus impatiens 20 1010 1020 T-A Bombus terrestris 20 10101020 T-A Danaus plexippus 20 1400 1410 G-A Homo sapiens 19 1603 1612 C-TBombus impatiens 96 1607 1699 C-T Bombus terrestris 26 1607 1627 C-THomo sapiens 19 1968 1977 C-T Apis mellifera 19 2001 2010 C-G Apismellifera 20 2041 2050 A-T 5 Lygus Homo sapiens 22 9 19 T-C hesperusHomo sapiens 20 11 20 T-A Homo sapiens 20 211 220 A-T 6 Lygus Boinbusterrestris 19 37 47 A-G hesperus Danaus plexippus 20 367 383 G-A Homosapiens 19 374 383 G-A Manaus plexippus 20 637 647 A-T Danaus plexippus26 802 815 A-T Apis mellifera 21 927 938 A-T Danaus plexippus 19 15291538 A-T Homo sapiens 19 2492 2501 T-C Homo sapiens 19 2493 2501 T-C 10Plutella Danaus plexippus 20 1390 1399 T-A xylostella Danaus plexippus19 1427 1437 C-T Danaus plexippus 23 1471 1482 G-A Manaus plexippus 201543 1553 T-C Homo sapiens 20 1645 1654 G-A Danaus plexippus 35 16541671 G-A Danaus plexippus 23 1726 1736 C-T Danaus plexippus 35 1942 1959G-A Danaus plexippus 20 2005 2016 C-T Danaus plexippus 20 2038 2048 C-TDanaus plexippus 20 2181 2190 G-A 11 Plutella Homo sapiens 19 235 244C-T xylostella Manaus plexippus 22 404 414 A-G Homo sapiens 19 517 526T-A Danaus plexippus 19 690 699 T-C Danaus plexippus 20 1771 1780 C-TDanaus plexippus 20 1891 1899 C-T Homo sapiens 20 1900 1910 A-T Danausplexippus 23 1942 1953 C-T 12 Plutella Danaus plexippus 21 184 194 T-Cxylostella Danaus plexippus 19 384 393 G-A Danaus plexippus 20 613 622C-T Danaus plexippus 32 916 931 A-T Homo sapiens 19 916 931 A-T Homosapiens 71 935 931 A-T Homo sapiens 19 1066 1078 C-T Danaus plexippus 191067 1078 C-T Danaus plexippus 20 1068 1078 C-T Homo sapiens 19 12071219 T-C Danaus plexippus 19 1208 1219 T-C Danaus plexippus 20 1209 1219T-C Danaus plexippus 19 1355 1365 G-A Homo sapiens 19 1474 1483 C-T Homosapiens 70 1884 1894 G-A 1895 C-T Homo sapiens 19 2142 2151 C-T Bombusterrestris 19 2203 2213 G-A Homo sapiens 19 2391 2401 G-A Homo sapiens19 2808 2817 A-G Danaus plexippus 21 3172 3182 C-T Danaus plexippus 203236 3245 C-T Homo sapiens 19 3249 3258 A-G Danaus plexippus 91 32703280 G-A Homo sapiens 19 3402 3411 C-T Danaus plexippus 27 3550 3564 C-T

Table 6 identifies examples of matches between the sequence of a dsRNAtrigger provided in Table 1 and a sequence identified in a non-targetorganism (NTO), where the match is a segment of at least 19 contiguousnucleotides. Table 6 provides examples of sequence modifications (e.g.,nucleotide changes at a specified location in the original dsRNA triggersequence) which eliminate a specific sequence match of at least 19contiguous nucleotides to a non-target organism. Table 6 furtherprovides non-limiting embodiments of a modified trigger sequence inwhich all of the nucleotide changes recited in Table 6 for a givenoriginal trigger sequence have been made to eliminate the all of therecited match(es) of at least 19 contiguous nucleotides to a non-targetorganism sequence. For example, the modified dsRNA trigger having SEQ IDNO:31 has one nucleotide change (A→U) at position 213, when compared tothe original dsRNA trigger having SEQ ID NO:15; this single changeeliminates matches of at least 19 contiguous nucleotides to twonon-target organisms, Bombus impatiens and Bombus terrestris. In anotherexample, the modified dsRNA trigger having SEQ ID NO:35 has fournucleotide changes (at positions 42, 79, 124, and 194) , when comparedto the original dsRNA trigger having SEQ ID NO:20; these changeseliminate four matches of at least 19 contiguous nucleotides to the NTODanaus plexippus. In another example, the modified dsRNA trigger havingSEQ ID NO:37 has four nucleotide changes (at positions 64, 72, 131, and280) , when compared to the original dsRNA trigger having SEQ ID NO:20;these changes eliminate four matches of at least 19 contiguousnucleotides to the NTOs Bombus impatiens, Bombus terrestris, Homosapiens, and Danaus plexippus.

TABLE 6 Nucleotide position Length (in where Nucleotide contiguouschange is change nucleotides) Nucleotide made to made to ModifiedOriginal of segment position of eliminate eliminate trigger TriggerNon-Target matching the beginning match to match to sequence SEQ IDOrganism (NTO) NTO of matching NTO NTO SEQ ID NO: species sequencesegment sequence sequence NO: 13 Homo sapiens 19 229 238 C-U 30 15Bombus impatiens 20 202 213 A-U 31 Bombus terrestris 20 202 213 A-U 16Bombus terrestris 19 22 32 A-G 32 17 Danarrs plexippus 19 131 140 A-U 3318 Homo sapiens 19 162 171 G-A 34 20 Danaus plexippus 20 33 42 U-A 35Danaus plexippus 19 70 79 A-U Danaus plerippus 23 114 124 G-A Danausplexippus 20 186 196 U-A 22 Honio sapiens 23 12 24 U-C 36 Homo sapiens26 12 24 U-C Homo sapiens 20 15 26 G-A Homo sapiens 23 15 26 G-A Danausplexippus 20 27 36 G-A Homo sapiens 23 54 71 C-U Homo sapiens 19 64 71C-U Homo sapiens 23 126 138 G-A Homo sapiens 20 126 138 G-A Apismellifera 20 210 220 A-G Bombus terrestris 20 210 990 A-G Danausplexippus 20 216 220 A-G Apis mellifera 20 225 220 A-G Apis mellifera 29228 220 A-G Apis mellifera 23 234 243 C-U 23 Bombus impatiens 29 53 64A-G 37 Bombus terrestris 20 62 72 U-A Homo sapiens 19 199 131 G-A Danausplexippus 20 271 280 A-G 24 Bombus impatiens 27 98 99 G-C 38 Danausplexippus 19 102 112 U-A Bombus impatiens 20 164 176 A-U Apis mellifera20 167 176 A-U Apis mellifera 29 167 176 A-U Danaus plexippus 20 167 176A-U Apis mellifera 19 186 192 T-C Bombus impatiens 26 188 196 A-G Apismellifera 26 200 204 A-U Apis mellifera 20 203 213 U-C Bombus impatiens20 203 213 U-C Bombus ierresiris 20 203 213 U-C Danaus plexippus 26 209224 G-U Apis mellifera 24 227 224 G-U Apis mellifera 97 718 994 G-UBombus impatiens 19 228 224 G-U Homo sapiens 20 231 242 G-A Apismellifera 23 251 264 G-A Bombus impatiens 20 281 291 A-U Bombusimpatiens 23 47 63 A-U Bombus impatiens 20 47 63 A-U Bombus terrestris20 50 63 A-U Danaus plexippus 20 53 63 A-U Bombus impatiens 39 86 99 G-CBombus impatiens 29 86 99 G-C Bombus terrestris 39 86 99 G-C Bombusimpatiens 30 95 99 G-C Apis mellifera 19 96 99 G-C Apis mellifera 22 9699 G-C 25 Apis mellifera 23 53 66 C-U 39 Apis mellifera 26 68 66 C-UBombus impatiens 26 68 66 C-U Apis mellifera 26 71 84 A-U Apis mellifera23 71 84 A-U Bombus impatiens 20 80 84 A-U Apis mellifera 20 89 99 A-UBombus impatiens 23 155 168 A-U Bombus impatiens 20 155 168 A-U Bombusterrestris 20 158 168 A-U Danaus plexippus 20 161 168 A-U Bombusimpatiens 39 194 206 G-A Bombus impatiens 29 194 206 G-A Bombusterrestris 39 194 206 G-A Bombus impatiens 30 203 206 G-A Apis mellifera19 204 206 G-A Apis mellifera 79 204 206 G-A Bombus impatiens 27 206 221U-G Danaus plexippus 19 210 221 U-G Bombus impatiens 20 272 285 A-U Apismellifera 20 275 285 A-U 26 Apis mellifera 28 275 285 A-U 40 Danausplexippus 20 275 285 A-U Homo sapiens 19 62 77 G-A Datzaus plexippus 2068 77 G-A Homo sapiens 20 68 77 G-A Homo sapiens 70 98 113 A-G Bombusterrestris 20 104 113 A-G Danaus plexippus 20 155 167 C-U Danausplexippus 23 155 167 C-U Homo sapiens 23 155 167 C-U Danaus plexippus 23197 211 U-C Danams plexippus 19 201 211 U-C Danaus plexippus 23 221 231U-C Homo sapiens 30 271 285 A-G Homo sapiens 71 271 285 A-G 27 Homosapiens 19 75 84 A-U 41 28 Homo sapiens 19 222 231 C-A 42 Bombusterrestris 19 283 291 U-C

Example 6

This example discloses embodiments related to polynucleotide molecules,such as dsRNA triggers designed to silence or suppress a target gene ofan insect pest of interest, and techniques for determining efficacy ofsuch molecules in suppressing a target gene or in controlling an insectpest. This example discloses a method of providing to an insect apolynucleotide, such as a recombinant RNA molecule or dsRNA trigger, inthe form of an ingestible composition.

One method for determining efficacy of polynucleotide molecules insuppressing a target gene or in controlling a pest Lygus species is asucrose feeding assay. In brief, this assay involves contacting westerntarnished plant bug (Lygus hesperus) nymphs with dsRNA triggers in aningestible composition (a sucrose solution), followed by maintenance onan artificial diet and monitoring of the nymphs' condition.

Parafilm sachets containing 2 milliliters of a 15% sucrose solution wereprepared for the feeding experiments, with the treatment sachetscontaining dsRNA triggers (see Table 1) at either 500micrograms/milliliter (or parts per million, ppm) or 1000micrograms/milliliter (or parts per million, ppm). In some experimentsthe sucrose solution further included 5 milligrams/milliliter yeast tRNAto inhibit potential nuclease activity. Artificial diet sachets werealso prepared using parafilm sachets containing 2 milliliters of awestern tarnished plant bug (Lygus hesperus) artificial diet prepared bycombining autoclaved, boiling water (518 milliliters) with 156.3 gramsof Bio-Serv® diet F9644B (Bio-Serv, Frenchtown, N.J.) in asurface-sterilized blender.

Third-instar Lygus hesperus nymphs were anesthetized under carbondioxide vapor and distributed among 4-ounce glass jars (40-75individuals per treatment). A piece of tissue paper was added to eachjar to absorb honeydew. Each experiment was carried out over 7 days. Thenymphs were allowed to feed for a 72-hour period (3 days) on the sucrosesachets, after which the sucrose sachets were removed and replaced withartificial diet sachets for the remaining 4 days of the 7-dayobservation period. All insects for a single treatment group wereobserved in a single arena, incubated at 27 degrees Celsius, 60%relative humidity. Initial mortality at day 0 (start of the 72-hoursucrose-feeding stage) was 0 in all cases. Mortality was recorded from 3days (i. e., the end of the 72-hour sucrose-feeding stage) up to 7 daysfrom the start of the experiment. For gene expression studies,immediately following the end of the 72-hour sucrose-feeding stage, 12living nymphs were removed from each jar and immediately frozen on dryice in individual matrix tubes to serve as samples for RNA measurementassays.

A series of feeding experiments using the above protocol was performedto assess activity of the dsRNA triggers T34616 (SEQ ID NO:14), T34617(SEQ ID NO:15), T34619 (SEQ ID NO:45), T34622 (SEQ ID NO:16), T42772(SEQ ID NO:22), T42768 (SEQ ID NO:46), and T44045 (SEQ ID NO:26) againstLygus hesperus. The dsRNA triggers T42772 (SEQ ID NO:22) and T44045 (SEQID NO:26) were also tested on Lygus lineolaris. A control trigger T35763(SEQ ID NO:27, a 300 bp dsRNA trigger targetting green fluorescentprotein) was used in the assays. At 500 micrograms/milliliter (500 ppm),enhanced mortality was observed with all Lygus-specific dsRNA triggerscompared to control treatments in the presence (Table 7) or absence ofyeast tRNA supplement (Table 8). T34622 (SEQ ID NO:16) (targetting theputative COPI coatomer beta prime subunit gene with SEQ ID NO:6) andT42772 (SEQ ID NO:22) (targetting the putative ubiquitin C gene with SEQID NO:7) were consistently the best performing triggers. Triggers T42772(SEQ ID NO:22) and T44045 (SEQ ID NO:26), both targetting a putativeubiquitin C gene (SEQ ID NO:7), exhibited similar activity in theWestern tarnished plant bug Lygus hesperus (Table 9A); both triggersalso appeared active (although slower to act) in a related pest species,the tarnished plant bug, Lygus lineolaris (Table 9B).

A three-replicate experiment tested the ubiquitin C triggers T44045 (SEQID NO:26) and T42768 (SEQ ID NO:46) on Lygus hesperus at 1000micrograms/milliliter (1000 ppm); the results demonstrated statisticallysignificant differences in the means for insect mortality at days 3, 4,5, 6, and 7 due to ubiquitin C trigger treatments when compared tocontrol treatments with 15% sucrose alone or 15% sucrose plus thecontrol trigger T35763 (SEQ ID NO:27) at 1000 micrograms/milliliter(1000 ppm) (Table 10).

TABLE 7 Insect mortality (as percent of total insects in treatment),dsRNA triggers tested at 500 ppm in presence of 5 mg/mL yeast tRNATrigger Total SEQ ID insects in Days since start of assay Treatment NO:treatment 0 3 4 5 6 7 15% sucrose — 58 0 10 33 55 64 72 15% sucrose + 5mg/mL tRNA — 57 0 16 37 54 63 70 T35763 GFP (control) 27 45 0 16 31 3860 69 T34616 rpL19 14 58 0 31 50 72 86 97 T34617 V-ATPase subunit A 1562 0 34 52 73 87 92 T34619 COPI coatomer beta subunit 45 56 0 36 43 6871 89 T34622 COPI coatomer beta prime subunit 16 69 0 43 58 78 90 93T42772 ubiquitin C 22 75 0 61 81 93 97 99

TABLE 8 Insect mortality (as percent of total insects in treatment),dsRNA triggers tested at 500 ppm (without yeast tRNA) Trigger Total SEQID insects in Days since start of assay Treatment NO: treatment 0 3 4 56 7 15% sucrose — 65 0 26 42 63 71 78 T35763 GOP (control) 27 38 0 29 5568 76 76 T34616 rpL19 14 62 0 24 47 71 87 94 T34617 V-ATPase subunit A15 71 0 35 68 83 89 92 T34619 COPI coatomer beta subunit 45 56 0 38 8691 95 95 T34622 COPI coatomer beta prime subunit 16 64 0 62 95 100 100100 T42772 ubiquitin C 22 30 0 63 80 90 93 100

TABLE 9A Lygus hesperus mortality (as percent of total insects intreatment), dsRNA triggers tested at 500 ppm in presence of 5 mg/mLyeast tRNA Trigger Total SEQ ID insects in Days since start of assayTreatment NO: treatment 0 3 4 5 6 7 15% sucrose — 28 0 36 50 57 64 6415% sucrose + 5 mg/mL tRNA — 43 0 44 56 70 77 79 T35763 GFP (control) 2732 0 50 66 78 88 91 T34622 COPI coatomer beta prime subunit 16 54 0 5272 82 94 98 T42772 ubiquitin C 22 58 0 69 95 97 100 100 T14045 ubiquitinC 26 80 0 66 85 94 99 100

TABLE 9B Lygus lineolaris mortality (as percent of total insects intreatment), dsRNA triggers tested at 500 ppm in presence of 5 mg/mLyeast tRNA Trigger Total SEQ ID insects in Days since start of assayTreatment NO: treatment 0 3 4 5 6 7 15% sucrose + 5 mg/mL tRNA — 10 0 2040 40 40 40 T35763 GFP (control) 27 16 0 19 44 50 56 69 T42772 ubiquitinC 22 20 0 30 45 60 75 95 T44045 ubiquitin C 26 21 0 29 43 67 86 90

TABLE 10 Lygus hesperus mortality (as percent of total insects intreatment), dsRNA triggers tested at 1000 ppm Trigger Total SEQ IDinsects in Days since start of assay Treatment NO: Replicate treatment 03 4 5 6 7 15% sucrose — 1 29 0 45 45 48 48 52 2 30 0 23 33 57 67 70 3 300 21 28 34 41 41 15% sucrose—mortality, mean (sd*) 0 (0) 30 (13) 35 (9)46 (11) 52 (13) 54 (14) T35763 GFP 27 1 30 0 20 30 53 53 53 (control) 230 0 13 17 53 63 67 3 30 0 30 40 50 57 60 T35763—mortality, mean (sd*) 0(0) 21 (8) 29 (12) 52 (2) 58 (5) 60 (7) T44045 26 1 30 0 37 53 63 77 87ubiquitin C 2 29 0 24 38 59 76 86 3 30 0 43 47 57 70 73T44045—mortality, mean (sd*) 0 (0) 35 (10) 46 (8) 60 (3) 74 (4) 82 (8)T42768 46 1 29 0 17 55 90 97 97 ubiquitin C 2 30 0 50 60 80 83 87 3 30 040 60 70 77 80 T42769—mortality, mean (sd*) 0(0) 36 (17) 58 (3) 80 (10)86 (10) 88 (8) *sd = standard deviation of the mean, given in percentage

Target gene suppression was assessed in Lygus hesperus by Quantigeneanalysis of three target genes (COPI coatomer beta prime subunit,V-ATPase subunit A, and COPI coatomer beta subunit). Sucrose feedingassays were carried out using the dsRNA triggers T34616 (SEQ ID NO:14),T34617 (SEQ ID NO:15), T34619 (SEQ ID NO:45), T34622 (SEQ ID NO:16),T42772 (SEQ ID NO:22), and T44045 (SEQ ID NO:26) tested at 500 or 100ppm in 15% sucrose as described above. Immediately following the end ofthe 72-hour sucrose-feeding stage, the nymphs were individually frozenand subjected to Quantigene analysis. All values were normalized againstthe expression levels of two reference genes (EFlalpha and actin). Theresults (Tables 11A-C) demonstrated that each of the three tested targetgenes was specifically suppressed by the corresponding dsRNA trigger,coincident with observed increased mortality when compared to treatmentwith sucrose only or with the control GEP trigger T35763 (SEQ ID NO:27).The observed target gene suppression (reduction in target geneexpression) was significant (p=0.05) compared to sucrose controls forfive of six trigger experiments; in the sixth trigger experiment (T34622at 1000 ppm, see Table 11A) visual suppression was observed just belowthe significance level. These results support the conclusion that themortality observed in 15% sucrose feeding assays is mediated by RNAi.

TABLE 11A Target gene: L. hesperus COPI coatomer beta prime subunit(F38E11), SEQ ID NO: 6 % Significant change @ p = 0.05 Trigger from fromconcentration Treatment Target gene control control? n/a sucrose onlyn/a n/a n/a 1000 ppm T34617 (SEQ ID NO: 15) V-ATPase subunit A  −4% no1000 ppm T34619 (SEQ ID NO: 45) COPI coatomer beta subunit   33% no 1000ppm T34622 (SEQ ID NO: 16) COPI coatomer beta prime −34% no subunit 1000ppm T35763 (SEQ ID NO: 27) GFP    4% no 1000 ppm T44045 (SEQ ID NO: 26)ubiquitin C   19% no n/a sucrose only n/a n/a n/a  500 ppm T34617 (SEQID NO: 15) V-ATPase subunit A −15% no  500 ppm T34619 (SEQ ID NO: 45)COPI coatomer beta subunit −31% no  500 ppm T34622 (SEQ ID NO: 16) COPIcoatomer beta prime −71% yes subunit  500 ppm T35763 (SEQ ID NO: 27) GFP−24% no n/a untreated (artificial diet fed) n/a    3% no

TABLE 11B Target gene: L. hesperus V-ATPase A subunit (CG3762), SEQ IDNO: 4 % Significant change @ p = 0.05 Trigger from from concentrationTreatment Target gene control control? n/a sucrose only n/a n/a n/a 1000ppm T34617 (SEQ ID NO: 15) V-ATPase subunit A −77% yes 1000 ppm T34619(SEQ ID NO: 45) COPI coatomer beta subunit −21% no 1000 ppm T34622 (SEQID NO: 16) COPI coatomet beta prime −23% no subunit 1000 ppm T35763 (SEQID NO: 27) GFP −23% no 1000 ppm T44045 (SEQ ID NO: 26) ubiquitin C −25%no n/a sucrose only n/a n/a n/a  500 ppm T34617 (SEQ ID NO: 15) V-ATPasesubunit A −63% yes  500 ppm T34619 (SEQ ID NO: 45) COPI coatomer betasubunit −25% no  500 ppm T34622 (SEQ ID NO: 16) COPI coatomer beta prime   7% no subunit  500 ppm T35763 (SEQ ID NO: 27) GFP −35% no n/auntreated (artificial diet fed) n/a   20% no

TABLE 11C Target gene: L. hesperus COPI coatomer beta subunit (CG6223),SEQ ID NO: 43 % Significant change @ p = 0.05 Trigger from fromconcentration Treatment Target gene control control? n/a sucrose onlyn/a n/a n/a 1000 ppm T34617 (SEQ ID NO: 15) V-ATPase subunit A    6% no1000 ppm 134619 (SEQ ID NO: 45) COPI coatomer beta subunit −49% yes 1000ppm T34622 (SEQ ID NO: 16) COPI coatomer beta prime   28% no subunit1000 ppm T35763 (SEQ ID NO: 27) GFP   18% no 1000 ppm 144045 (SEQ ID NO:26) ubiquitin C   21% no n/a sucrose only n/a n/a n/a  500 ppm T34617(SEQ ID NO: 15) V-ATPase subunit A −22% no  500 ppm T34619 (SEQ ID NO:45) COPI coatomer beta subunit −54% yes  500 ppm T34622 (SEQ ID NO: 16)COPI coatomer beta prime −21% no subunit  500 ppm T35763 (SEQ ID NO: 27)GFP −34% no n/a untreated (artificial diet fed) n/a   18% no n/a = notapplicable

Example 7

The polynucleotides of this invention are generally designed to modulateexpression by inducing regulation or suppression of an insect targetgene and are designed to have a nucleotide sequence essentiallyidentical or essentially complementary to the nucleotide sequence aninsect target gene or cDNA (e. g., SEQ ID NOs:1-12 and 43-44) or to thesequence of RNA transcribed from an insect target gene, which can becoding sequence or non-coding sequence. These effective polynucleotidemolecules that modulate expression are referred to herein as a“trigger”, or “triggers”. This example describes non-limiting techniquesuseful in the design and selection of polynucleotides as “triggers” tomodulate expression of an insect target gene.

Selection of Polynucleotide Triggers by “Tiling”

Polynucleotides of use in the invention need not be of the full lengthof a target gene, and in many embodiments are of much shorter length incomparison to the target gene. An example of a technique that is usefulfor selecting effective triggers is “tiling”, or evaluation ofpolynucleotides corresponding to adjacent or partially overlappingsegments of a target gene.

Effective polynucleotide “triggers” can be identified by “tiling” genetargets in selected length fragments, e. g., fragments of 200-300nucleotides in length, with partially overlapping regions, e. g., ofabout 25 nucleotides, along the length of the target gene. To suppress asingle gene, trigger sequences are designed to correspond to (have anucleotide identity or complementarity with) regions that are unique tothe target gene; the selected region of the target gene can includecoding sequence or non-coding sequence (e. g., promoter regions, 3′untranslated regions, introns and the like) or a combination of both.

Where it is of interest to design a target effective in suppressingmultiple target genes, the multiple target gene sequences are alignedand polynucleotide triggers designed to correspond to regions with highsequence homology in common among the multiple targets. Conversely,where it is of interest to design a target effective in selectivelysuppressing one among multiple target sequences, the multiple targetgene sequences are aligned and polynucleotide triggers designed tocorrespond to regions with no or low sequence homology in common amongthe multiple targets.

In a non-limiting example, anti-sense single-stranded RNA triggers aredesigned for each of the target genes listed in Table 1 as follows.Multiple anti-sense single-stranded RNA triggers, each of 200-300nucleotides in length and with a sequence corresponding to (i. e., foranti-sense triggers, complementary to) a fragment of a target genehaving a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs:1-12 and 43-44 are designedso that each trigger's sequence overlaps about 25 nucleotides of thenext adjacent trigger's sequence, in such a way that the multipletriggers in combination cover the full length of the target gene. (Sensetriggers are designed in an analogous fashion, where the triggersequence is identical to a fragment of the target gene. Similarly,double-stranded triggers can be designed by providing pairs of sense andanti-sense triggers, each pair of triggers overlapping the next adjacentpair of triggers.)

The polynucleotide triggers are tested by any convenient means forefficacy in silencing the insect target gene. Examples of a suitabletest include the bioassays described herein in the working Examples.Another test involves the topical application of the polynucleotidetriggers either directly to individual insects or to the surface of aplant to be protected from an insect infestation. One desired result oftreatment with a polynucleotide of this invention is prevention orcontrol of an insect infestation, e. g., by inducing in an insect aphysiological or behavioural change such as, but not limited to, growthstunting, increased mortality, decrease in reproductive capacity,decrease in or cessation of feeding behavior or movement, or decrease inor cessation of metamorphosis stage development. Another desired resultof treatment with a polynucleotide of this invention is provision of aplant that exhibits improved resistance to an insect infestation.

The tiling procedure can be repeated, if desired. A polynucleotidetrigger found to provide desired activity can itself be subjected to atiling procedure. For example, multiple overlapping anti-sensesingle-stranded RNA triggers are designed, each of 50-60 nucleotides inlength and with a sequence corresponding to (i. e., for anti-sensetriggers, complementary to) the fragment of a target gene having asequence selected from SEQ ID NOs:1-12 and 43-44 for which a singlepolynucleotide trigger of 300 nucleotides was found to be effective.Additional rounds of tiling analysis can be carried out, where triggersas short as 18 or 19 nucleotides are tested.

Effective polynucleotide triggers of any size can be used, alone or incombination, in the various methods of this invention. In someembodiments, a single polynucleotide trigger is used to make acomposition of this invention (e. g., a composition for topicalapplication, or a recombinant DNA construct useful for making atransgenic plant). In other embodiments, a mixture or pool of differentpolynucleotide triggers is used; in such cases the polynucleotidetriggers can be for a single target gene or for multiple target genes.In some embodiments, a polynucleotide trigger is designed to targetdifferent regions of the target gene, e. g., a trigger can includemultiple segments that correspond to different exon regions of thetarget gene, and “spacer” nucleotides which do not correspond to atarget gene can optionally be used in between or adjacent to thesegments.

Thermodynamic Considerations in Selecting Polynucleotide Triggers

Polynucleotide triggers can be designed or their sequence optimisedusing thermodynamic considerations. For example, polynucleotide triggerscan be selected based on the thermodynamics controlling hybridizationbetween one nucleic acid strand (e. g., a polynucleotide trigger or anindividual siRNA) and another (e. g., a target gene transcript)

Methods and algorithms to predict nucleotide sequences that are likelyto he effective at RNAi-mediated silencing of a target gene are known inthe art. Non-limiting examples of such methods and algorithms include“i-score”, described by Ichihara et al. (2007) Nucleic Acids Res.,35(18): 123e; “Oligowalk”, publicly available atrna.urmc.rochester.edu/servers/oligowalk and described by Lu et al.(2008) Nucleic Acids Res., 36:W104-108; and “Reynolds score”, describedby Khovorova et al. (2004) Nature Biotechnol., 22:326-330.

Permitted Mismatches

By “essentially identical” or “essentially complementary” is meant thatthe trigger polynucleotide (or at least one strand of a double-strandedpolynucleotide) has sufficient identity or complementarity to the targetgene or to the RNA transcribed from a target gene (e. g., thetranscript) to suppress expression of a target gene (e. g., to effect areduction in levels or activity of the target gene transcript and/orencoded protein). Polynucleotides of this invention need not have 100percent identity or complementarity to a target gene or to the RNAtranscribed from a target gene to suppress expression of the target gene(e. g., to effect a reduction in levels or activity of the target genetranscript or encoded protein, or to provide control of an insectspecies). In some embodiments, the polynucleotide or a portion thereofis designed to be essentially identical to, or essentially complementaryto, a sequence of at least 18 or 19 contiguous nucleotides in either thetarget gene or the RNA transcribed from the target gene. In certainembodiments, an “essentially identical” polynucleotide has 100 percentsequence identity or at least about 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91,92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, or 99 percent sequence identity whencompared to the sequence of 18 or more contiguous nucleotides in eitherthe endogenous target gene or to an RNA transcribed from the targetgene. In certain embodiments, an “essentially complementary”polynucleotide has 100 percent sequence complementarity or at leastabout 83, 84, 85, 86, 87, 88, 89, 90, 91, 92, 93, 94, 95, 96, 97, 98, or99 percent sequence complementarity when compared to the sequence of 18or more contiguous nucleotides in either the target gene or RNAtranscribed from the target gene.

Polynucleotides containing mismatches to the target gene or transcriptcan be used in certain embodiments of the compositions and methods ofthis invention. In some embodiments, the polynucleotide includes atleast 18 or at least 19 contiguous nucleotides that are essentiallyidentical or essentially complementary to a segment of equivalent lengthin the target gene or target gene's transcript. In certain embodiments,a polynucleotide of 19 contiguous nucleotides that is essentiallyidentical or essentially complementary to a segment of equivalent lengthin the target gene or target gene's transcript can have 1 or 2mismatches to the target gene or transcript (i. e., 1 or 2 mismatchesbetween the polynucleotide's 19 contiguous nucleotides and the segmentof equivalent length in the target gene or target gene's transcript). Incertain embodiments, a polynucleotide of 20 or more nucleotides thatcontains a contiguous 19 nucleotide span of identity or complementarityto a segment of equivalent length in the target gene or target gene'stranscript can have 1 or 2 mismatches to the target gene or transcript.In certain embodiments, a polynucleotide of 21 continuous nucleotidesthat is essentially identical or essentially complementary to a segmentof equivalent length in the target gene or target gene's transcript canhave 1, 2, or 3 mismatches to the target gene or transcript. In certainembodiments, a polynucleotide of 22 or more nucleotides that contains acontiguous 21 nucleotide span of identity or complementarity to asegment of equivalent length in the target gene or target gene'stranscript can have 1, 2, or 3 mismatches to the target gene ortranscript.

In designing polynucleotides with mismatches to an endogenous targetgene or to an RNA transcribed from the target gene, mismatches ofcertain types and at certain positions that are more likely to betolerated can be used. In certain exemplary embodiments, mismatchesformed between adenine and cytosine or guanosine and uracil residues areused as described by Du et cd. (2005) Nucleic Acids Res., 33:1671-1677.In some embodiments, mismatches in 19 base-pair overlap regions arelocated at the low tolerance positions 5, 7, 8 or 11 (from the 5′ end ofa 19-nucleotide target), at medium tolerance positions 3, 4, and12-17(from the 5′ end of a 19-nucleotide target), and/or at the hightolerance positions at either end of the region of complementarity, i.e., positions 1, 2, 18, and 19 (from the 5′ end of a 19-nucleotidetarget) as described by Du et 01. (2005) Nucleic Acids Res.,33:1671-1677. Tolerated mismatches can be empirically determined inroutine assays such as those described herein in the working Examples.

In some embodiments, the polynucleotides include additional nucleotidesfor reasons of stability or for convenience in cloning or synthesis. Inone embodiment, the polynucleotide is a dsRNA including an RNA strandwith a segment of at least 21 contiguous nucleotides of a sequenceselected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42,45, and 46 and further including an additional 5′ G or an additional 3′C or both, adjacent to the segment. In another embodiment, thepolynucleotide is a double-stranded RNA including additional nucleotidesto form an overhang, for example, a dsRNA including 2deoxyribonucleotides to form a 3′ overhang.

Embedding Active Triggers in Neutral Sequence

In an embodiment, a bioactive trigger (i. e., a polynucleotide with asequence corresponding to the target gene and which is responsible foran observed suppression of the target gene) is embedded in “neutral”sequence, i. e., inserted into additional nucleotides that have nosequence identity or complementarity to the target gene. Neutralsequence can be desirable, e. g., to increase the overall length of apolynucleotide. For example, it can be desirable for a polynucleotide tobe of a particular size for reasons of stability, cost-effectiveness inmanufacturing, or biological activity.

It has been reported that in another coleopteran species, Diabroticavirgifera, dsRNAs greater than or equal to approximately 60 base-pairs(bp) are required for biological activity in artificial diet bioassays;see Bolognesi et al. (2012) PLoS ONE 7(10): e47534.doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0047534. Thus, in one embodiment, a21-base-pair dsRNA trigger corresponding to a target gene in Table 1 andfound to provide control of an insect infestation is embedded in neutralsequence of an additional 39 base pairs, thus forming a polynucleotideof about 60 base pairs. In another embodiment, a single 21-base-pairtrigger is found to be efficacious when embedded in larger sections ofneutral sequence, e.g., where the total polynucleotide length is fromabout 60 to about 300 base pairs. In another embodiment, at least onesegment of at least 21 contiguous nucleotides of a sequence selectedfrom the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46is embedded in larger sections of neutral sequence to provide anefficacious trigger. In another embodiment, segments from multiplesequences selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29,30-42, 45, and 46 are embedded in larger sections of neutral sequence toprovide an efficacious trigger.

It is anticipated that the combination of certain recombinant RNAs ofthis invention (e.g., the dsRNA triggers having a sequence selected fromthe group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46, oractive fragments of these triggers) with one or more non-polynucleotidepesticidal agents will result in a synergetic improvement in preventionor control of insect infestations, when compared to the effect obtainedwith the recombinant RNA alone or the non-polynucleotide pesticidalagent alone. Routine insect bioassays such as the bioassays describedherein in the working Examples are useful for defining dose-responsesfor larval mortality or growth inhibition using combinations of thepolynucleotides of this invention and one or more non-polynucleotidepesticidal agents (e. g., a patatin, a plant lectin, a phytoecdysteroid,a Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal protein, a Xenorhabdusinsecticidal protein, a Photorhabdus insecticidal protein, a Bacilluslaterosporous insecticidal protein, and a Bacillus sphaericusinsecticidal protein). One of skill in the art can test combinations ofpolynucleotides and non-polynucleotide pesticidal agents in routinebioassays to identify combinations of bioactives that are synergisticand desirable for use in protecting plants from insect infestations.

Example 8

This example illustrates non-limiting embodiments of the use ofpolynucleotides of this invention in topically applied compositions forpreventing or controlling insect infestations.

Compositions containing one or more polynucicotides of this inventionarc useful as topical treatments of plants, animals, or environmentswherein prevention or control of a Leptinotarsa species infestation isdesired. In embodiments, a polynucleotide trigger for a target gene witha sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs:1-12 and 43-44, i. e., the targetgenes identified in Table 1, as described in the preceding examples, isincluded in an effective amount in a composition designed to be provideddirectly (e. g., by contact or ingestion) to an insect species, or aplant or environment wherein prevention or control of infestation bythat insect is desired. In embodiments, a polynucleotide trigger for atarget gene with a sequence selected from SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29,30-42, 45, and 46 is included in an effective amount in suchcompositions. In embodiments, a dsRNA trigger with a strand having asequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29,30-42, 45, and 46, or active fragments of these triggers, is included inan effective amount in such compositions. Such compositions areformulated and manufactured according to the art and can be in anyconvenient form, e.g., a solution or mixture of solutions, an emulsion,a suspension, a dispersible powder, a solid or liquid bait, a seedcoating, or a soil drench. Embodiments of such compositions includethose where the polynucleotide of this invention is provided in a livingor dead microorganism such as a bacterium or fungal or yeast cell, orprovided as a microbial fermentation product, or provided in a living ordead plant cell, or provided as a synthetic recombinant polynucleotide.In an embodiment the composition includes a non-pathogenic strain of amicroorganism that contains a polynucleotide of this invention;ingestion or intake of the microorganism results in stunting ormortality of the insect pest; non-limiting examples of suitablemicroorganisms include E. coil, B. thuringiensis, Pseudomonas sp.,Photorhabdus sp., Xenorhabdus sp., Serratia entomophila and relatedSerratia sp., B. sphaericus, B. cereus, B. laterosporus, B. popilliae,Clostridium Nfermentans and other Clostridium species, or otherspore-forming gram-positive bacteria. In an embodiment, the compositionincludes a plant virus vector including a polynucleotide of thisinvention; feeding by an insect on a plant treated with the plant virusvector results in stunting or mortality of the insect. In an embodiment,the composition includes a baculovirus vector including a polynucleotideof this invention; ingestion or intake of the vector results in stuntingor mortality of the insect. In an embodiment, a polynucleotide of thisinvention is encapsulated in a synthetic matrix such as a polymer orattached to particulates and topically applied to the surface of aplant; feeding by an insect on the topically treated plant results instunting or mortality of the insect. In an embodiment, a polynucleotideof this invention is provided in the form of a plant cell (e. g., atransgenic plant cell of this invention) expressing the polynucleotide;ingestion of the plant cell or contents of the plant cell by an insectresults in stunting or mortality of the insect.

Embodiments of the compositions optionally include the appropriatestickers and wetters required for efficient foliar coverage as well asUV protectants to protect polynucleotides such as dsRNAs from UV damage.Such additives are commonly used in the bioinsecticide industry and areknown to those skilled in the art. Compositions for soil application caninclude granular formulations that serve as bait for insect larvae.Embodiments include a carrier agent, a surfactant, an organosilicone, apolynucleotide herbicidal molecule, a non-polynucleotide herbicidalmolecule, a non-polynucleotide pesticide, a safener, an insectattractant, and an insect growth regulator. In embodiments, thecomposition further includes at least one pesticidal agent selected fromthe group consisting of a patatin, a plant lectin, a phytoecdysteroid, aBacillus thuringiensis insecticidal protein, a Xenorhabdus insecticidalprotein, a Photorhabdus insecticidal protein, a Bacillus laterosporousinsecticidal protein, and a Bacillus sphaericus insecticidal protein.

Such compositions are applied in any convenient manner, e. g., byspraying or dusting the insect directly, or spraying or dusting a plantor environment wherein prevention or control of infestation by thatinsect is desired, or by applying a coating to a surface of a plant, orby applying a coating to a seed (or seed potato) in preparation for theseed's planting, or by applying a soil drench around roots of a plantfor which prevention or control of infestation by that insect isdesired.

An effective amount of a polynucleotide of this invention is an amountsufficient to provide control of the insect, or to prevent infestationby the insect; determination of effective amounts of a polynucleotide ofthis invention are made using routine assays such as those described inthe working Examples herein. While there is no upper limit on theconcentrations and dosages of a polynucleotide of this invention thatcan be useful in the methods and compositions provided herein, lowereffective concentrations and dosages will generally be sought forefficiency and economy. Non-limiting embodiments of effective amounts ofa polynucleotide include a range from about 10 nanograms per milliliterto about 100 micrograms per milliliter of a polynucleotide in a liquidform sprayed on a plant, or from about 10 milligrams per acre to about100 grams per acre of polynucleotide applied to a field of plants, orfrom about 0.001 to about 0.1 microgram per milliliter of polynucleotidein an artificial diet for feeding the insect. Where compositions of thisinvention are topically applied to a plant, the concentrations can beadjusted in consideration of the volume of spray or treatment applied toplant leaves or other plant part surfaces, such as flower petals, stems,tubers, fruit, anthers, pollen, leaves, roots, or seeds. In oneembodiment, a useful treatment for herbaceous plants using 25-merpolynucleotides of this invention is about 1 nanomole (nmol) ofpolynucleotides per plant, for example, from about 0.05 to 1 nmolpolynucleotides per plant. Other embodiments for herbaceous plantsinclude useful ranges of about 0.05 to about 100 nmol, or about 0.1 toabout 20 nmol, or about 1 nmol to about 10 nmol of polynucleotides perplant. In certain embodiments, about 40 to about 50 nmol of a ssDNApolynucleotide of this invention are applied. In certain embodiments,about 0.5 nmol to about 2 nmol of a dsRNA of this invention is applied.In certain embodiments, a composition containing about 0.5 to about 2.0milligrams per milliliter, or about 0.14 milligrams per milliliter of adsRNA or an ssDNA (21-mer) of this invention is applied. In certainembodiments, a composition of about 0.5 to about 1.5 milligrams permilliliter of a dsRNA polynucleotide of this invention of about 50 toabout 200 or more nucleotides is applied. In certain embodiments, about1 nmol to about 5 nmol of a dsRNA of this invention is applied to aplant. In certain embodiments, the polynucleotide composition astopically applied to the plant contains at least one polynucleotide ofthis invention at a concentration of about 0.01 to about 10 milligramsper milliliter, or about 0.05 to about 2 milligrams per milliliter, orabout 0.1 to about 2 milligrams per milliliter. Very large plants,trees, or vines can require correspondingly larger amounts ofpolynucleotides. When using long dsRNA molecules of this invention thatcan be processed into multiple oligonucleotides (e. g., multipletriggers encoded by a single recombinant DNA molecule of thisinvention), lower concentrations can be used. Non-limiting examples ofeffective polynucleotide treatment regimes include a treatment ofbetween about 0.1 to about 1 nmol of polynucleotide molecule per plant,or between about 1 nmol to about 10 nmol of polynucleotide molecule perplant, or between about 10 nmol to about 100 nmol of polynucleotidemolecule per plant.

Embodiments of compositions of this invention include a “transferagent”, i. e., an agent that, when combined with a composition includinga polynucleotide of this invention that is topically applied to thesurface of an organism, enables the polynucleotide to enter the cells ofthat organism. Such transfer agents can he incorporated as part of thecomposition including a polynucleotide of this invention, or can beapplied prior to, contemporaneously with, or following application ofthe composition including a polynucleotide of this invention. Inembodiments, a transfer agent is an agent that improves the uptake of apolynucleotide of this invention by an insect. In embodiments, atransfer agent is an agent that conditions the surface of plant tissue,e. g., seeds, leaves, stems, roots, flowers, or fruits, to permeation bya polynucleotide of this invention into plant cells. In embodiments, thetransfer agent enables a pathway for a polynucleotide of this inventionthrough cuticle wax barriers, stomata, and/or cell wall or membranebarriers into plant cells.

Suitable transfer agents include agents that increase permeability ofthe exterior of the organism or that increase permeability of cells ofthe organism to polynucleotides of this invention. Suitable transferagents include a chemical agent, or a physical agent, or combinationsthereof. Chemical agents for conditioning or transfer include (a)surfactants, (b) an organic solvent or an aqueous solution or aqueousmixtures of organic solvents, (c) oxidizing agents, (d) acids, (e)bases, (f) oils, (g) enzymes, or combinations thereof. In embodiments,application of a composition of this invention and a transfer agentoptionally includes an incubation step, a neutralization step (e. g., toneutralize an acid, base, or oxidizing agent, or to inactivate anenzyme), a rinsing step, or combinations thereof. Suitable transferagents can be in the form of an emulsion, a reverse emulsion, aliposome, or other micellar-like composition, or can cause thepolynucleotide composition to take the form of an emulsion, a reverseemulsion, a liposome, or other micellar-like composition. Embodiments oftransfer agents include counter-ions or other molecules that are knownto associate with nucleic acid molecules, e. g., inorganic ammoniumions, alkyl ammonium ions, lithium ions, polyamines such as spermine,spermidine, or putrescine, and other cations. Embodiments of transferagents include organic solvents such as DMSO, DMF, pyridine,N-pyrrolidine, hexamethylphosphoramide, acetonitrile, dioxane,polypropylene glycol, or other solvents miscible with water or thatdissolve phosphonucleotides in non-aqueous systems (such as is used insynthetic reactions). Embodiments of transfer agents include naturallyderived or synthetic oils with or without surfactants or emulsifiers, e.g., plant-sourced oils, crop oils (such as those listed in the 9^(th)Compendium of Herbicide Adjuvants, publicly available on-line atherbicide.adjuvants.com), paraffinic oils, polyol fatty acid esters, oroils with short-chain molecules modified with amides or polyamines suchas polyethyleneimine or N-pyrrolidine.

Embodiments of transfer agents include organosilicone preparations. Forexample, a suitable transfer agent is an organosilicone preparation thatis commercially available as SILWET L-77® brand surfactant having CASNumber 27306-78-1 and EPA Number: CAL.REG.NO. 5905-50073-AA, andcurrently available from Momentive Performance Materials, Albany, N.Y.In embodiments where a SILWET L-77® brand surfactant organosiliconepreparation is used as transfer agent in the form of a spray treatment(applied prior to, contemporaneously with, or following application ofthe composition including a polynucleotide of this invention) of plantleaves or other plant surfaces, freshly made concentrations in the rangeof about 0.015 to about 2 percent by weight (wt percent) (e. g., about0.01, 0.015, 0.02, 0.025, 0.03, 0.035, 0.04, 0.045, 0.05, 0.055, 0.06,0.065, 0.07, 0.075, 0.08, 0.085, 0.09, 0.095, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5,0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9,2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.5 wt percent) are efficacious in preparing a leafor other plant surface for transfer of a polynucleotide of thisinvention into plant cells from a topical application on the surface.One embodiment includes a composition that comprises a polynucleotide ofthis invention and a transfer agent including an organosiliconepreparation such as Silwet L-77 in the range of about 0.015 to about 2percent by weight (wt percent) (e. g., about 0.01, 0.015, 0.02, 0.025,0.03, 0.035, 0.04, 0.045, 0.05, 0.055, 0.06, 0.065, 0.07, 0.075, 0.08,0.085, 0.09, 0.095. 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5, 0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0,1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9, 2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.5 wtpercent). One embodiment includes a composition that comprises apolynucleotide of this invention and a transfer agent including SILWETL-77® brand surfactant in the range of about 0.3 to about 1 percent byweight (wt percent) or about 0.5 to about 1%., by weight (wt percent).

Organosilicone compounds useful as transfer agents for use in thisinvention include, but are not limited to, compounds that include: (a) atrisiloxane head group that is covalently linked to, (b) an alkyl linkerincluding, but not limited to, an n-propyl linker, that is covalentlylinked to, (c) a polyglycol chain, that is covalently linked to, (d) aterminal group. Trisiloxane head groups of such organosilicone compoundsinclude, but are not limited to, heptamethyltrisiloxane. Alkyl linkerscan include, but are not limited to, an n-propyl linker. Polyglycolchains include, but are not limited to, polyethylene glycol orpolypropylene glycol. Polyglycol chains can comprise a mixture thatprovides an average chain length “n” of about “7.5”. In certainembodiments, the average chain length “n” can vary from about 5 to about14. Terminal groups can include, but are not limited to, alkyl groupssuch as a methyl group. Organosilicone compounds useful as transferagents for use in this invention include, but are not limited to,trisiloxane ethoxylate surfactants or polyalkylene oxide modifiedheptamethyl trisiloxane. An example of a transfer agent for use in thisinvention is Compound I:

(Compound I: polyalkyleneoxide heptamethyltrisiloxane, average n=7.5).

Organosilicone compounds useful as transfer agents for use in thisinvention are used, e. g., as freshly made concentrations in the rangeof about 0.015 to about 2 percent by weight (wt percent) (e. g., about0.01, 0.015, 0.02, 0.025, 0.03, 0.035, 0.04, 0.045, 0.05, 0.055, 0.06,0.065, 0.07, 0.075, 0.08, 0.085, 0.09, 0.095, 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, 0.4, 0.5,0.6, 0.7, 0.8, 0.9, 1.0, 1.1, 1.2, 1.3, 1.4, 1.5, 1.6, 1.7, 1.8, 1.9,2.0, 2.1, 2.2, 2.3, 2.5 wt percent).

Embodiments of transfer agents include one or more salts such asammonium chloride, tetrabutylphosphonium bromide, and ammonium sulfate,provided in or used with a composition including a polynucleotide ofthis invention. In embodiments, ammonium chloride, tetrabutylphosphoniumbromide, and/or ammonium sulfate are used at a concentration of about0.5% to about 5% (w/v), or about 1% to about 3% (w/v), or about 2%(w/v). In certain embodiments, the composition including apolynucleotide of this invention includes an ammonium salt at aconcentration greater or equal to 300 millimolar. In certainembodiments, the composition including a polynucleotide of thisinvention includes an organosilicone transfer agent in a concentrationof about 0.015 to about 2 percent by weight (wt percent) as well asammonium sulfate at concentrations from about 80 to about 1200 mM orabout 150 mM to about 600 mM.

Embodiments of transfer agents include a phosphate salt. Phosphate saltsuseful in a composition including a polynucleotide of this inventioninclude, but are not limited to, calcium, magnesium, potassium, orsodium phosphate salts. In certain embodiments, the compositionincluding a polynucleotide of this invention includes a phosphate saltat a concentration of at least about 5 millimolar, at least about 10millimolar, or at least about 20 millimolar. In certain embodiments, thecomposition including a polynucleotide of this invention includes aphosphate salt in a range of about 1 mM to about 25 mM or in a range ofabout 5 mM to about 25 mM. In certain embodiments, the compositionincluding a polynucleotide of this invention includes sodium phosphateat a concentration of at least about 5 millimolar, at least about 10millimolar, or at least about 20 millimolar. In certain embodiments, thecomposition including a polynucleotide of this invention includes sodiumphosphate at a concentration of about 5 millimolar, about 10 millimolar,or about 20 millimolar. In certain embodiments, the compositionincluding a polynucleotide of this invention includes a sodium phosphatesalt in a range of about 1 mM to about 25 mM or in a range of about 5 mMto about 25 mM. In certain embodiments, the composition including apolynucleotide of this invention includes a sodium phosphate salt in arange of about 10 mM to about 160 mM or in a range of about 20 mM toabout 40 mM. In certain embodiments, the composition including apolynucleotide of this invention includes a sodium phosphate buffer at apH of about 6.8.

Embodiments of transfer agents include surfactants and/or effectivemolecules contained therein. Surfactants and/or effective moleculescontained therein include, but are not limited to, sodium or lithiumsalts of fatty acids (such as tallow or tallowamines or phospholipids)and organosilicone surfactants. In certain embodiments, the compositionincluding a polynucleotide of this invention is formulated withcounter-ions or other molecules that are known to associate with nucleicacid molecules. Non-limiting examples include, tetraalkyl ammonium ions,trialkyl ammonium ions, sulfonium ions, lithium ions, and polyaminessuch as spermine, spermidine, or putrescine. In certain embodiments, thecomposition including a polynucleotide of this invention is formulatedwith a non-polynucleotide herbicide e. g., glyphosate, auxin-likebenzoic acid herbicides including dicamba, chloramben, and TBA,glufosinate, auxin-like herbicides including phenoxy carboxylic acidherbicide, pyridine carboxylic acid herbicide, quinoline carboxylic acidherbicide, pyrimidine carboxylic acid herbicide, and benazol in-ethylherbicide, sulfonylureas, imidazolinones, bromoxynil, delapon,cyclohezanedione, protoporphyrinogen oxidase inhibitors, and4-hydroxyphenyl-pyruvate-dioxygenase inhibiting herbicides. In certainembodiments, the composition including a polynucleotide of thisinvention is formulated with a non-polynucleotide pesticide, e. g., apatatin, a plant lectin, a phytoecdysteroid, a Bacillus thuringiensisinsecticidal protein, a Xenorhabdus insecticidal protein, a Photorhabdusinsecticidal protein, a Bacillus laterosporous insecticidal protein, anda Bacillus sphaericus insecticidal protein.

All of the materials and methods disclosed and claimed herein can bemade and used without undue experimentation as instructed by the abovedisclosure. Although the materials and methods of this invention havebeen described in terms of preferred embodiments and illustrativeexamples, it will be apparent to those of skill in the art thatvariations can be applied to the materials and methods described hereinwithout departing from the concept, spirit and scope of this invention.All such similar substitutes and modifications apparent to those skilledin the art are deemed to be within the spirit, scope and concept of thisinvention as defined by the appended claims.

What is claimed is:
 1. A method for controlling an insect infestation ofa plant comprising contacting with a dsRNA an insect that infests aplant, wherein said dsRNA comprises at least one segment of 18 or morecontiguous nucleotides with a sequence of about 95% to about 100%complementarity with a fragment of a target gene of said insect, andwherein said target gene has a DNA sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-12 and 43-44.
 2. The method of claim 1,wherein said insect is selected from the group consisting of Spodopteraspp., Lygus spp., Euschistus spp., and Plutella spp.
 3. The method ofclaim 1, wherein: (a) said insect is Spodoptera frugiperdo (fallarmyworm) and said target gene comprises a DNA sequence selected fromthe group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-3; (b) said insect is Lygushesperus (western tarnished plant bug) and said target gene comprises aDNA sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:4-7, 43,and 44; (c) said insect is Euschistus heros (neotropical brown stinkbug) and said target gene comprises a DNA sequence selected from thegroup consisting of SEQ ID NOs:8-9; or (d) said insect is Plutellaxylostella (diamondback moth) and said target gene comprises a DNAsequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:10-12.
 4. Themethod of claim 1, wherein: (a) said insect is Spodoptera frugiperda(fall armyworm) and said dsRNA comprises a sequence selected from thegroup consisting of SEQ ID NOs:17-19; (b) said insect is Lygus hesperus(western tarnished plant bug) and said dsRNA comprises a sequenceselected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:14-16, 22, 26, 45, and46; (c) said insect is Euschistus heros (neotropical brown stink bug)and said dsRNA comprises a sequence selected from the group consistingof SEQ ID NOs:23-25; or (d) said insect is Plutella xylostella(diamondback moth) and said dsRNA comprises a sequence selected from thegroup consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13, 20-21, and 28-29.
 5. The method ofclaim 1, wherein said at least one segment is multiple segments.
 6. Themethod of claim 1, wherein said dsRNA is (a) blunt-ended, or (b) has anoverhang at at least one terminus.
 7. The method of claim 1, whereinsaid dsRNA is (a) chemically synthesized, or (b) produced by expressionin a microorganism, expression in a plant cell, or by microbialfermentation.
 8. The method of claim 1, wherein said dsRNA is chemicallymodified.
 9. The method of claim 1, wherein said contacting comprisesapplication of a composition comprising said dsRNA to a surface of saidinsect or to a surface of said plant infested by said insect.
 10. Themethod of claim 9, wherein said composition comprises a solid, liquid,powder, suspension, emulsion, spray, encapsulation, microbeads, carrierparticulates, film, matrix, or seed treatment.
 11. The method of claim1, wherein said contacting comprises providing said dsRNA in acomposition that further comprises one or more components selected fromthe group consisting of a carrier agent, a surfactant, anorganosilicone, a polynucleotide herbicidal molecule, anon-polynucleotide herbicidal molecule, a non-polynucleotide pesticide,a safener, an insect attractant, and an insect growth regulator.
 12. Themethod of claim 1, wherein said contacting comprises providing saiddsRNA in a composition that further comprises at least one pesticidalagent selected from the group consisting of a patatin, a plant lectin, aphytoecdysteroid, a Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidal protein, aXenorhabdus insecticidal protein, a Photorhabdus insecticidal protein, aBacillus laterosporous insecticidal protein, and a Bacillus sphaericusinsecticidal protein.
 13. The method of claim 1, wherein said contactingcomprises providing said dsRNA in a composition that is ingested by saidinsect.
 14. The method of claim 13, wherein said composition that isingested further comprises one or more components selected from thegroup consisting of a carrier agent, a surfactant, an organosilicone, apolynucleotide herbicidal molecule, a non-polynucleotide herbicidalmolecule, a non-polynucleotide pesticide, a safener, an insectattractant, and an insect growth regulator.
 15. The method of claim 13,wherein said composition that is ingested further comprises at least onepesticidal agent selected from the group consisting of a patatin, aplant lectin, a phytoecdysteroid, a Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidalprotein, a Xenorhabdus insecticidal protein, a Photorhabdus insecticidalprotein, a Bacillus laterosporous insecticidal protein, and a Bacillussphaericus insecticidal protein.
 16. A method of causing mortality orstunting in an insect, comprising providing in the diet of an insect atleast one recombinant RNA comprising at least one silencing elementessentially identical or essentially complementary to a fragment of atarget gene sequence of said insect, wherein said target gene sequenceis selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-12 and 43-44, andwherein ingestion of said recombinant RNA by said insect results inmortality or stunting in said insect.
 17. The method of claim 16,wherein said recombinant RNA comprises at least one RNA strand having asequence of about 95% to about 100% identity or complementarily with asequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29,30-42, 45, and
 46. 18. The method of claim 16, wherein: (a) said insectis Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) and said target gene comprisesa DNA sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-3; (b)said insect is Lygus hesperus (western tarnished plant bug) and saidtarget gene comprises a DNA sequence selected from the group consistingof SEQ ID NOs:4-7, 43, and 44; (c) said insect is Euschistus heros(neotropical brown stink bug) and said target gene comprises a DNAsequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:8-9; or (d)said insect is Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth) and said targetgene comprises a DNA sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQID NOs:10-12.
 19. The method of claim 16, wherein: (a) said insect isSpodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) and said silencing clementcomprises a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ IDNOs:17-19; (b) said insect is Lygus hesperus (western tarnished plantbug) and said silencing element comprises a sequence selected from thegroup consisting of SEQ ID NOs:14-16, 22, 26, 45, and 46; (c) saidinsect is Euschistus heros (neotropical brown stink bug) and saidsilencing element comprises a sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:23-25; or (d) said insect is Plutellaxylostella (diamondback moth) and said silencing element comprises asequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13, 20-21, and28-29.
 20. The method of claim 16, wherein said recombinant RNA isdsRNA.
 21. The method of claim 16, wherein said recombinant RNA is (a)blunt-ended dsRNA, or (b) dsRNA with an overhang at at least oneterminus.
 22. The method of claim 16, wherein said recombinant RNA isprovided in a microbial or plant cell or in a microbial fermentationproduct.
 23. The method of claim 16, wherein said recombinant RNA ischemically synthesized.
 24. The method of claim 16, wherein said insectis in a larval or nymph stage.
 25. The method of claim 16, wherein saidinsect is an adult.
 26. The method of claim 20, wherein said dsRNAcomprises at least one RNA strand having a sequence of about 95% toabout 100% identity or complementarity with a sequence selected from thegroup consisting SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and
 46. 27. Aninsecticidal composition comprising an insecticidally effective amountof a recombinant RNA molecule, wherein said recombinant RNA moleculecomprises at least one segment of 18 or more contiguous nucleotides witha sequence of about 95% to about 100% complementarity with a fragment ofa target gene of an insect that infests a plant, and wherein said targetgene has a DNA sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ IIINOs:1-12 and 43-44.
 28. The insecticidal composition of claim 27,wherein said recombinant RNA molecule comprises at least one RNA strandhaving a sequence of about 95% to about 100% identity or complementaritywith a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26,28-29, 30-42, 45, and
 46. 29. The insecticidal composition of claim 27,wherein said recombinant RNA molecule is a dsRNA comprising an RNAstrand having a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ IDNOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and
 46. 30. The insecticidal composition ofclaim 29, wherein said dsRNA is at least 50 base pairs in length. 31.The insecticidal composition of claim 27, wherein: (a) said insect isSpodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) and said target gene comprises aDNA sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-3; (b)said insect is Lygus hesperus (western tarnished plant bug) and saidtarget gene comprises a DNA sequence selected from the group consistingof SEQ ID NOs:4-7, 43, and 44; (c) said insect is Euschistus heros(neotropical brown stink bug) and said target gene comprises a DNAsequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:8-9; or (d)said insect is Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth) and said targetgene comprises a DNA sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQID NOs:10-12.
 32. The insecticidal composition of claim 27, wherein: (a)said insect is Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) and saidrecombinant RNA molecule comprises at least one RNA strand having asequence of about 95% to about 100% identity or complementarity with asequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:17-19; (b)said insect is Lygus hesperus (western tarnished plant bug) and saidrecombinant RNA molecule comprises at least one RNA strand having asequence of about 95% to about 100% identity or complementarity with asequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:14-16, 22, 26,45, and 46; (c) said insect is Euschistus heros (neotropical brown stinkhug) and said recombinant RNA molecule comprises at least one RNA strandhaving a sequence of about 95% to about 100% identity or complementaritywith a sequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:23-25;or (d) said insect is Plutella xylostella (diamondback moth) and saidrecombinant RNA molecule comprises at least one RNA strand having asequence of about 95% to about 100% identity or complementarity with asequence selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13, 20-21, and28-29.
 33. The insecticidal composition of claim 27, wherein: (a) saidinsect is Spodoptera frugiperda (fall armyworm) and said recombinant RNAmolecule is a dsRNA comprising an RNA strand having a sequence selectedfrom the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:17-19; (b) said insect is Lygushesperus (western tarnished plant bug) and recombinant RNA molecule is adsRNA comprising an RNA strand having a sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:14-16, 22, 26, 45, and 46; (c) said insect isEuschistus heros (neotropical brown stink bug) and recombinant RNAmolecule is a dsRNA comprising an RNA strand having a sequence selectedfrom the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:23-25; or (d) said insect isPlutella xylostella (diamondback moth) and recombinant RNA molecule is adsRNA comprising an RNA strand having a sequence selected from the groupconsisting of SEQ ID NOs:13, 20-21, and 28-29.
 34. The insecticidalcomposition of claim 27, further comprising one or more componentsselected from the group consisting of a carrier agent, a surfactant, anorganosilicone, a polynucleotide herbicidal molecule, anon-polynucleotide herbicidal molecule, a non-polynucleotide pesticide,a safener, an insect attractant, and an insect growth regulator.
 35. Theinsecticidal composition of claim 27, further comprising at least onepesticidal agent selected from the group consisting of a patatin, aplant lectin, a phytoecdysteroid, a Bacillus thuringiensis insecticidalprotein, a Xenorhabdus insecticidal protein, a Photorhabdus insecticidalprotein, a Bacillus laterosporous insecticidal protein, and a Bacillussphaericus insecticidal protein.
 36. The insecticidal composition ofclaim 27, wherein said composition is in a form selected from the groupconsisting of a solid, liquid, powder, suspension, emulsion, spray,encapsulation, microbeads, carrier particulates, film, matrix, soildrench, insect diet or insect bait, and seed treatment.
 37. A planttreated with the insecticidal composition of claim 27, or seed of saidplant, wherein said plant exhibits improved resistance to said insect.38. A method of providing a plant having improved resistance to aninsect, comprising expressing in said plant a recombinant DNA constructcomprising DNA encoding RNA that includes at least one silencing elementessentially identical or essentially complementary to a fragment of atarget gene sequence of said insect, wherein said target gene sequenceis selected from the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:1-12 and 43-44, andwherein ingestion of said RNA by said insect results in mortality orstunting in said insect.
 39. The method of claim 38, wherein saidsilencing element has a sequence of about 95% to about 100% identity orcomplementarity with a sequence selected from the group consisting ofSEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and
 46. 40. The method of claim 38,wherein said recombinant DNA construct further comprises a heterologouspromoter operably linked to said DNA encoding RNA that includes at leastone silencing clement, wherein said heterologous promoter is functionalin a plant cell.
 41. The method of claim 38, wherein said expressing isby means of transgenic expression or transient expression.
 42. Themethod of claim 38, further comprising expression in said plant of atleast one pesticidal agent selected from the group consisting of apatatin, a plant lectin, a phytoecdysteroid, a Bacillus thuringiensisinsecticidal protein, a Xenorhabdus insecticidal protein, a Photorhabdusinsecticidal protein, a Bacillus laterosporous insecticidal protein, anda Bacillus sphaericus insecticidal protein.
 43. The plant havingimproved resistance to an insect, provided by the method of claim 38.44. Fruit, seed, or propagatable parts of the plant of claim
 43. 45. Arecombinant DNA construct comprising a heterologous promoter operablylinked to DNA encoding an RNA transcript comprising a sequence of about95% to about 100% identity or complementarity with a sequence selectedfrom the group consisting of SEQ ID NOs:13-26, 28-29, 30-42, 45, and 46.46. The recombinant DNA construct of claim 45, wherein said heterologouspromoter is (a) functional for expression of said RNA transcript in abacterium.
 47. The recombinant DNA construct of claim 46, wherein saidbacterium is selected from the group consisting of Escherichia coli,Bacillus species, Pseudomonas species, Xenorhabdus species, orPhotorhabdus species.
 48. The recombinant DNA construct of claim 45,wherein said heterologous promoter is functional in a plant cell.
 49. Arecombinant vector comprising the recombinant DNA construct of claim 45.50. The recombinant vector of claim 49, wherein said recombinant vectoris a recombinant plant virus vector or a recombinant baculovirus vector.51. A plant chromosome or plastid comprising the recombinant DNAconstruct of claim
 45. 52. A transgenic plant cell having in its genomethe recombinant DNA construct of claim 45
 53. A transgenic plantcomprising the transgenic plant cell of claim
 52. 54. A commodityproduct produced from the transgenic plant of claim
 53. 55. A transgenicprogeny seed or propagatable plant part of the transgenic plant of claim53.